From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>,
Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Clear possible pending irq when remuxing GPIOs
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:27:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZA2od6NfNczeVh4v1D4_UBHrErQLHjyGRXWOVPh9f8hQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123160139.3.I771b6594b2a4d5b7fe7e12a991a6640f46386e8d@changeid>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:02 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> Conceptually, we can envision the input on Qualcomm SoCs to pass
> through a bunch of blocks between coming into the chip and becoming a
> GPIO interrupt.
This looks like really good detective engineering, something
I do myself from time to time.
Bjorn does this look OK to you?
I'm wondering about patch 1/3, does it need to be applied
with the rest?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 0:01 [PATCH 1/3] irqchip: qcom-pdc: Fix phantom irq when changing between rising/falling Douglas Anderson
2020-11-24 0:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: qcom: Allow SoCs to specify a GPIO function that's not 0 Douglas Anderson
2020-11-24 0:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Clear possible pending irq when remuxing GPIOs Douglas Anderson
2020-11-24 8:27 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2020-11-24 10:37 ` Maulik Shah
2020-11-24 11:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 12:43 ` Maulik Shah
2020-11-24 13:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 17:33 ` Doug Anderson
2020-11-24 7:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] irqchip: qcom-pdc: Fix phantom irq when changing between rising/falling Maulik Shah
2020-11-24 8:28 ` Linus Walleij
2020-11-24 16:55 ` Doug Anderson
2020-11-24 17:42 ` Maulik Shah
2020-11-24 17:46 ` Doug Anderson
2020-11-24 9:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 17:01 ` Doug Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdZA2od6NfNczeVh4v1D4_UBHrErQLHjyGRXWOVPh9f8hQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).