From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: qdf2xxx: add names to the gpios Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:40:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1488843122-7960-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:36248 "EHLO mail-it0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751509AbdCOJkT (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:40:19 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id w124so46066017itb.1 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 02:40:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1488843122-7960-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Timur Tabi , Bjorn Andersson Cc: Stephen Boyd , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > The sysfs and debugfs entries for pin control drivers work better when > the individual pins are given real names, even if they are all just > "gpio0", "gpio1", etc. > > Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi Patch tentatively applied (looks right to me), unless Bj=C3=B6rn has concer= ns. Is this a problem in other qcom pinctrl drivers? Yours, Linus Walleij