From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] gpio / ACPI: register to ACPI events automatically Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:50:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1385460350-17543-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1385460350-17543-5-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1385460350-17543-5-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Chris Ball , Johannes Berg , Rhyland Klein , Adrian Hunter , Alexandre Courbot , Mathias Nyman , Rob Landley , Heikki Krogerus , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Instead of asking each driver to register to ACPI events we can just call > acpi_gpiochip_register_interrupts() for each chip that has an ACPI handle. > The function checks chip->to_irq and if it is set to NULL (a GPIO driver > that doesn't do interrupts) the function does nothing. > > We also add the a new header drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h that is used for > functions internal to gpiolib and add ACPI GPIO chip registering functions > to that header. > > Once that is done we can remove call to acpi_gpiochip_register_interrupts() > from its only user, pinctrl-baytrail.c > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Two questions: - Can you please rebase patches 3-6 on my GPIO tree "devel" branch? - Can this patch be placed first? It does not seem to depend on the others, to to push dependent patches to the end of the series. Yours, Linus Walleij