From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E60CC433E0 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27B565243 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230435AbhCIQXW (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:23:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55236 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231133AbhCIQXE (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:23:04 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81729C06174A for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:23:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u18so21426141ljd.3 for ; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 08:23:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2VEBPwGiW8iHNDo2S5SALWhYgfg8oMZ+MLjMTN2t4bQ=; b=M7a650blRHIys3AP+ZB4N6Xw5LZfQXbQARQmYGkbzzXObRIwssKk1xNaQZ8ASf37H/ 0/ofasF9xPe33mjzsmM8UbVwgsYvc2W5MNYRZX0TlXTldnIwJi4pqeQtN5fs8AxMfPx1 FJIGigKYLOLsLzZhF4g+bNv/3hpOdHOV1sG6IZ0btEyeAwfHdc4P8iiIKaduQkrAGbZk 0HB2qqySo2/E4mn5Yod9P6gro8vqK0jAif7K2ONUHC61/mVl7dior9nYQsYo/pP2A1Xh /hl5SauEpphhDppEl/ywEkv6OGOO00HQkohE5O8kWhkgo1KTOGcHoZRFFcyL3qcYi3p7 UCjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2VEBPwGiW8iHNDo2S5SALWhYgfg8oMZ+MLjMTN2t4bQ=; b=rUB7oD11FhRn9n1ctozGe3snFH0kMJs6mbrLpxkwndqr1Bv8Syl9ythWa9JL2UZN58 M13hLdzOhRrkCetSNWueOwb1dbxPoABrznCx0ceRLHL1i/QTVfHs60Un/emjTGqhXE+/ e69NbdnG2SPhPDYKKsoLHUPsOA03YunL7MY9zK8l45zd0haWkXXu3grYpxeOQYyOF8JT 3T31MgtOLizFP9kIzWtoKhCU9tBkJSHCdTzXb/OS0B6+ZN/nklfzfVO4vpwRpk5wcqW2 hUgTtLFXLQ0+x32HYrcZw+0rdsUpp5wo4UahrEaxplrsySV1qqNv5W31J0txOQSh3z5b nF3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PJJneFjqSDdYxP3ossfW9Oo+qXGLjX99MDcH6hls/YFgTLNRj u8EvqoHIjuGtmWIN478r8ZyYdtUcRCN7t/4unNjqXVxhXZK5rI28 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5Cp6md++96ogmtHjbwaXEEBMg2J3GkzoBZPbknRZmkETfrorf18UhLVRNVJh9/0K2tZNU7x+zaYfueTwHP+0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:103a:: with SMTP id w26mr14890455ljm.273.1615306983054; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 08:23:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210303131858.3976-1-shawn.guo@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:22:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Shawn Guo , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , MSM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:40 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Pin control has been though thru and implemented in the ACPICA, but we have no > time to fulfil this work to cover pin control subsystem in the Linux kernel. Oh sweet! I suppose it means that firmware using it could appear, and at that point it will become a matter of priority to get it done in the kernel. Yours, Linus Walleij