From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3434CC43332 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C17230FC for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2406020AbhAZPCF (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:02:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52496 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2406014AbhAZPCC (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:02:02 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22316C061A31 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:01:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 3so19956461ljc.4 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:01:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lirWGcwxQ/9sPMV+iwf/h9oS1/CrHerBIWG2c3EGSGk=; b=oxDNjk3iYXpmm6bruISbusuPot9758mJ8Dgv+nZKud8ztqpQNcDycw29k3Ecz0PiyL o42TBWfTSj49+9TPcA+9BZ3Zim6TnBDn56Ya7bmFqDxaz0wH8t9qCSXFJezTPjfiRwaB O6bJhXI6k27/dPyMOVaiNgRVN/zh8XTY05LAa0W6F2iIsY65mUpDEvUDWbKPts4L4neT UlP7PrSI5Q/gg5m8VV4LRpepfajeLsAioMA8gRGlOYAe5ItJpoAKB2veaJUXnDlyjpbl uzlUiwlNAa5t4lx/ZS9G6uSjCBSLmozFkbTwd7jb14OdgxmDinoWOCAHfVC5eMwuA4le p0OQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lirWGcwxQ/9sPMV+iwf/h9oS1/CrHerBIWG2c3EGSGk=; b=BpjDxdyLDwaXhr3tqr5EpTutuYEV4AB26VRuND7KHNOIos8N+47QSnm8xlHCYFRKBR qB8O+SrTaOYNSpMq6Z10cOqtQvCzN5+HMybRki3ChXlQeFq2ctILvW6JPYUzLPSu4+zD 3+enUGgRrdwcVVihb6zxj5sgGlpkV9WmhB0s+7OTMH6Hd6bicz1ZvLZBO2qYD+Gj0jXu BaDHwCTeB6++/7UvcqGD1EWoR8aSFmksPY/uDPVWnZzKLuz2LBbRKub+QTQpaImareiF FLy+f++IbCjymmKUUvoG0Q+giZUjs9sk0gCK1G5oMAgzWOoyKNvHvKGsF4wQ4b2XBcUN EZfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZLuR/k6Ox1F7E0nI0MurZUchYzCH6XWvssWnYHuJJPN2et0EA vjifHooQ9z7mmCJ1TXEk3wXxlk2pvqz/4gbZychaer/IzorDVg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7GgZKBeeQTizTG5WDVnMhfRi/N35rHmdXVZj4220Qaw571LqXQu07Fhyh4yYgtdx58u66xSSMeVVEqT4HoEo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b4cd:: with SMTP id r13mr3179920ljm.273.1611673280673; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:01:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210126050817.GA187797@x1> In-Reply-To: <20210126050817.GA187797@x1> From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:01:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pinctl.rst instead of pinctrl.rst? To: Drew Fustini Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:08 AM Drew Fustini wrote: > I was having trouble finding the pinctrl rst documentation until I > realized it is named pinctl with no 'r': > > Documentation/driver-api/pinctl.rst > > Is there a reason for this? No. > Is it worth me submitting a patch to rename and change tree-wide > references? I would rather rename it pin-control.rst in that case. Yours, Linus Walleij