From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: s3c64xx: Tidy up handling of regulator GPIO lookups Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 07:54:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20180212131717.27193-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20180212131717.27193-17-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20180213111147.kr4kecqbhmcoq6w2@localhost.localdomain> <20180419150119.5yhf3uupdolg3cnv@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180419150119.5yhf3uupdolg3cnv@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Charles Keepax Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , patches@opensource.cirrus.com, Lee Jones List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Charles Keepax wrote: > From: Charles Keepax > > Rather than unconditionally registering the GPIO lookup table only do so > for devices that require it. > > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax > --- > > Do you have any objections to the following? > > If we are lucky I might be able to find time to test these early > next week. Well at least there is reasonable chance I can test > the 5102 stuff when you resend, not sure I have a device to > test the wm1277 but will have a look. Also I haven't run up > Cragganmore in a little while so might depend a little on how > much people have broken it since last I did :-) I folded this in on top of my series, also adding the table entries for wm5102 and wm5102 reva. Sorry for the delay, I was sidetracked... Yours, Linus Walleij