From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5834C433DB for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE2B64FE9 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233065AbhCKOj6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:39:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33382 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233583AbhCKOjk (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:39:40 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19DDC061574 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 06:39:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id k9so40119004lfo.12 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 06:39:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aRX3JxL9ArLTMgxvg9Vap8aqfjFmbYdIVVaZ27whFws=; b=o6Zm2K0Fr8q5q9PtKQteoTYia0u2gqkf/Nfpmd9Ysmr6n38jRx+78XcJwzjUSg91Rb A23aGhbCJa6L8HeF1S/Ub9dRlfL8ykT8HfDZAX5H3/HFAhJqrC/ojzdfTLH0krNFL2bX x/gzA5b10kGzYV9MXCZLGuO5Z/OEXlqmEovymnceQermlW1yLXtN5LuFqTn0/NOEmyBm BwPrIhPxh8DdzHbxYrItrFOBf14Et4bQuvVQjid9zzJU3DTdCqTvkt3GVRSdohDBMOc2 9VBO5DPPpJ1mIrqzdNVTxHA40GFPoXACkldx1qnJfxKFuy1RmZce7QNkb7ytkPZfFdjc EsVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aRX3JxL9ArLTMgxvg9Vap8aqfjFmbYdIVVaZ27whFws=; b=Q8Xh2UA/B9PuzbIc83zNr9h1Ge/fWimzSjgdtA/Se7ZhA0VDC+PzlztXo8we5QNeNu fPzBKD9I0ygha32iZvXv7ClnbyHXJWNiK1rIOSMGvFjqc5Db9X3S+IYy5oFW3bl0CGG5 o4hTpQQIf32OIR3RVingsXeXjlwYGzsQEV9fBpFhoPdW8aOIQxlr9K45S3F6yB9nHuh7 gQYS/kWU++vK2W7BMUyVoLMZKMvzGi9GOYcOA8oPgXYixr9Edbd1NWCSZoulWyBLTGk7 weWQK+9pttuURBk4Tp8HfnA2hxfZI8Ywap8plGp6hiw6HNKh2YrsMRk7O5g22DsrEYIw ZdAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Svm8kFvdVWTtMa3sBdNg0RstD8Wax4gy9PeqP8/vw0ucD+hD9 GFSKA+3KTO+jTs4iqPQjjNTFdsZ7uu/UspISqenhDw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzL7b1QCjpPuDvu5hMDtVElSv+oLOTPmam9LzLVeTqzRxH6pQkh+F02MtmXCazZCgtaLEU618wN5tWM9Pdnu3Q= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4d95:: with SMTP id g21mr2608064lfe.29.1615473578223; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 06:39:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5c08bd61-688f-e95b-5fa3-584f190ed4bf@xilinx.com> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:39:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately To: Michal Simek Cc: Colin Ian King , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:28 PM Michal Simek wrote: > > It will take me 2 hours to re-run the analysis, but from eyeballing the > > code I think the assignments will fix this. > > would be good if you can rerun it and get back to us on this. > I will wait if something else will pop up and then will send v2 with > this that Linus can apply this one instead. Just send an incremental patch, that reflects the issues found in a nice way in the development history. Yours, Linus Walleij