From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ED2C433DB for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4975464DEF for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236619AbhCAOwU (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:52:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44140 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236626AbhCAOwO (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:52:14 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EED1C06178A for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 06:51:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id k9so6008045lfo.12 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 06:51:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9BnG6OcLz4MdkA8niW29Ho+/QnSajzdzvM6d+k9RjhA=; b=YdCqs+GMjIwYpuli9n6ChS9KcSVMisnjvmPMVhyTZr1+QgSH6aYWMXdGN7+BX+bC0N RUf1HL4pXH40LSezbd8Vz+YeBJ7BvNhLsUREpDjlwIF02U4C8/cEuCW2e9Aspgz5bkFY RibEIgSjE69BuZ+V0NH9HCiRyAN9/Ur02tR9K6zXnm21K0vf+DdTDJ8rovmSKE7iK4yJ bfxk7TUjcuYiXgH2nyPEGHs2DrOfjmefWHshsYBhF9Ypn74S2M8poDHQSjxLt6yhz5rG g3T8bHOGyMwokI2l2zqTu1bng3ENcQnuLNG8nvpnXGTu3xMVRVvEVWVfwcZoYY1JH8WS PLIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9BnG6OcLz4MdkA8niW29Ho+/QnSajzdzvM6d+k9RjhA=; b=uIqGaphmC5o7vnbVWFwakB5QGwkiHtKf0/nWoT+ZpA0B13RLPvEYEOnrL2MWiX8h34 PnpJGeDdyCg6diKAAUGUeO2+koGDNGqdFzfWdwXxkTD5nRX38Iwh1Ex4GfEBIR84CLer +XDC0GSZv+hz5SxmD3uNPLflWS5RAUupSLORK3ZndY5XYEHlpRKR6f19EN+Fe3Lkev0W Uu2TnfLrb+bQSsnhMtHeCcw0fR3bAsWwJzEKgmQpe64PClUjQ/kkb0ksu1/F3DEVv0jV 8kuJvFuF4DwG86CJKjRaq+WNsnXzM9PDTPZNILjlEh85tOS/wZHuAkHZ4+uj8zWmKHP6 oRXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530H4XQhZqKOhEAV3TMrkzkbLeQ49zmBcTSVPFAVfmXHdE++OB8X 9UMDhcvbGMLjnpLrI9n4SvDJKXMLdQu/VppAh/CW6w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2hltL6dqzQRsiwOWELt2s4pnYTKVvz2cutcRv4szIKBMeFXJwGheIGYaQTVosfai7/l6TGb0G57xQwMFnKWs= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4d95:: with SMTP id g21mr10180879lfe.29.1614610289944; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 06:51:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210208222203.22335-1-info@metux.net> <20210208222203.22335-8-info@metux.net> In-Reply-To: <20210208222203.22335-8-info@metux.net> From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:51:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] gpio: amd-fch: add oftree probing support To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Pantelis Antoniou , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:24 PM Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > Add support for probing via device tree. (...) > + pdata->gpio_num = of_property_count_elems_of_size(dev->of_node, > + "gpio-regs", > + sizeof(u32)); > + pdata->gpio_reg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(int)*pdata->gpio_num, > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!pdata->gpio_reg) > + goto nomem; I don't know what the idea is with this but register are not normally defined in the DTS files. The registers are determined from the compatible value. > + pdata->gpio_names = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(char*)*pdata->gpio_num, > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!pdata->gpio_names) > + goto nomem; (...) > + ret = of_property_read_string_array(dev->of_node, "gpio-line-names", > + pdata->gpio_names, pdata->gpio_num); And this is already handled by the core. Yours, Linus Walleij