From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] serial/gpio: exar: Fixes and support for IOT2000 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:38:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <9520074b-3731-7bbe-d59d-cbed90ac16bb@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9520074b-3731-7bbe-d59d-cbed90ac16bb@siemens.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Sudip Mukherjee , Andy Shevchenko , Sascha Weisenberger List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2017-06-20 10:19, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >>> This makes the gpio-exar driver usable, which was prevented by a number >>> of fatal bugs, and adds support for the SIMATIC IOT2040 to the 8250-exar >>> driver and, indirectly, to gpio-exar as well. It's a cross-subsystem >>> series, so I'm also cross-posting to the serial and gpio lists. >>> >>> Changes in v6: >> >> I merged some of the patches, that applied. Let's see if they survive >> in linux-next, else I guess we need to fix this in the -rcs or for the next >> kernel cycle. > > Weird that things did not apply. I just did a cherry-pick for all those > 10 patches on top of 5c996b7eb52c, and that went smoothly. Please let me > know which baseline is needed, and I will rebase. This was on the "devel" branch of my GPIO tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/log/?h=devel Yours, Linus Walleij