From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio: sysfs: make the sysfs export behavior consistent
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:12:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb_1LrtbUssBEgYqOLgUY9XAbVBr+tezt5FCM3tdB9RYw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927074221.9985-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 9:42 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> For drivers or board files that set gpio_chip->names, the links to the
> GPIO attribute group created on sysfs export will be named after the
> line's name set in that array. For lines that are named using device
> properties, the names pointer of the gpio_chip struct is never assigned
> so they are exported as if they're not named.
>
> The ABI documentation does not mention the former behavior and given
> that the majority of modern systems use device-tree, ACPI or other way
> of passing GPIO names using device properties - bypassing gc->names -
> it's better to make the behavior consistent by always exporting lines as
> "gpioXYZ".
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
I'm in favor of this.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Story time:
That's a good story :) Fun to see how you arrived at this.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-02 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-27 7:42 [RFC PATCH] gpio: sysfs: make the sysfs export behavior consistent Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-09-30 1:03 ` Kent Gibson
2024-09-30 7:20 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-09-30 7:55 ` Kent Gibson
2024-10-02 13:12 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2024-10-02 14:31 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdb_1LrtbUssBEgYqOLgUY9XAbVBr+tezt5FCM3tdB9RYw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).