From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5483C4363A for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763FA223BF for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="HokrgSJn" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2510006AbgJVJrc (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 05:47:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46126 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2509920AbgJVJr1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 05:47:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9FA2C0613CE for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 02:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id k18so1277759wmj.5 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 02:47:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2VkNWLz8fdcGIZ0t/keGE/XgabajTokOfztMicfS35M=; b=HokrgSJnGW7pzR0hh6cw0dkxEGGLmeWN5JZ7a5LLozpJqCeBi8SNle3LiexsoQF/bX Dk/EOgy3xNW8qEpxN2FJRJRFAsyX/Y/fMq0FBjycKZz5lQ9/0bHOb63vKpxKsj3JVq9Z C7e13T+0C4HeBA5+sSfWePp1qB4iOhUUpJlNy+y0gLoPjqxyhtIjP8pC2gppSd/wB4rI 3W/FGPu9ATaCB7FKKQZ6xm7OUm7/kK9KkmC6IUJ6HkDA1dOMfuCf6yugTqU5XRTXY83s azf+IOpXFqFzOm1F0UwfRwoGWKCAm6t+qHfjKCBFjRrXjGtw00GQYrlZXXj7hg34MYdu 4kQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2VkNWLz8fdcGIZ0t/keGE/XgabajTokOfztMicfS35M=; b=Wfmb47xd7o+JVfy1lhuxkPX2f3KcrtRzo3yugswGiSXkXrYjdjV4h/hJufSMo/1IRm 7J9kBZXfvURebjOjlcefJ8Y+1tr/jLBzbe/eRQR87RNWeF5o1lRTPX2UzT8C4nDsy6dP LVYS+Hmqay7K2AJS4fVoiznuTLWTnKUVBd/MW/2FR8Qp0UTCqBVt0OscJlZG3YgyhNrY JPKthwwmO2mkhhQylfWd1esxTML02jjqct0KaL3HLy3GffVH0RHItbqkWX7KB4cwqn8n jSE7OhLVTdc0LdMQDC7dV+0UesWJN3xwD09VHDO77DnKoQh9YdcMU/gVEr0OdIu3+Dzl l3Iw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Rw9TMhyIFu/A32mQqFxDcJ+pMyUyryzfKLmNLxAlxTl1CatwV ni2SHDU633jvDFQPDccJWGW913ZQgZF96H8RKCc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPg5lWty/6XIb6+n09bVzUcJs0fzh2hHboFSSVoCvU/u/Dih7z9iJvd4H8OtdyHIdT06jmJZb9RACZPBdme4U= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:495:: with SMTP id 143mr1591037wme.63.1603360045561; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 02:47:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201015083805.GA10354@laureti-dev> <20201015093526.GA10891@laureti-dev> <20201015105718.GA11027@laureti-dev> <20201015121312.GA7166@laureti-dev> <20201022063935.GA23978@laureti-dev> In-Reply-To: From: Jack Winch Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:47:14 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [libgpiod] cxx bindings: time_point vs duration To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Helmut Grohne , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Bartosz Golaszewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org > Jack: FYI the clock configuration didn't make it this merge window so > it'll be released in v5.11. Ah, that is a shame. Such is life, though. > I also don't envision making a libgpiod > v2.0 release any earlier than that so we have plenty of time to > discuss it and come to the right conclusion. That is also a shame, but at least that gives some time to undertake further review of libgpiod v2.0 and potentially make some further improvements. What's the time window for this? Jack On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:36 PM Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:09 AM Jack Winch wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > What I did not want to see happen is the change as currently proposed > > be applied and cause issues in the future. > > > > Jack: FYI the clock configuration didn't make it this merge window so > it'll be released in v5.11. I also don't envision making a libgpiod > v2.0 release any earlier than that so we have plenty of time to > discuss it and come to the right conclusion. > > Bartosz > > [snip]