Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] deferred_probe_timeout logic clean up

[Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>]

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 2:38 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Saravana,
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:15 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> > This series is based on linux-next + these 2 small patches applies on top:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220526034609.480766-1-saravanak@google.com/
> >
> > A lot of the deferred_probe_timeout logic is redundant with
> > fw_devlink=on.  Also, enabling deferred_probe_timeout by default breaks
> > a few cases.
> >
> > This series tries to delete the redundant logic, simplify the frameworks
> > that use driver_deferred_probe_check_state(), enable
> > deferred_probe_timeout=10 by default, and fixes the nfsroot failure
> > case.
> >
> > Patches 1 to 3 are fairly straightforward and can probably be applied
> > right away.
> >
> > Patches 4 to 9 are related and are the complicated bits of this series.
> >
> > Patch 8 is where someone with more knowledge of the IP auto config code
> > can help rewrite the patch to limit the scope of the workaround by
> > running the work around only if IP auto config fails the first time
> > around. But it's also something that can be optimized in the future
> > because it's already limited to the case where IP auto config is enabled
> > using the kernel commandline.
>
> Thanks for your series!
>
> > Yoshihiro/Geert,
> >
> > If you can test this patch series and confirm that the NFS root case
> > works, I'd really appreciate that.
>
> On Salvator-XS, Micrel KSZ9031 Gigabit PHY probe is no longer delayed
> by 9s after applying the two earlier patches, and the same is true
> after applying this series on top.
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>
> I will do testing on more boards, but that may take a while, as we're
> in the middle of the merge window.

Thanks for testing. I missed your email until now. I sent out a v2
series a few days back and that's a much better solution than v1. If
you can test that series instead, that'd be nice.

-Saravana