From: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
To: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>
Cc: Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com, Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com,
Ken.Xue@amd.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl/amd: use byte access to clear irq/wake status bits
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:38:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGS+omDPkC=Tv7SJ91cLxrFnab_VPC3VZRAugkvAUokkkoYSTg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD8Lp446Zu=EhdzRE9pEoskMWeOHOovoAJ8qtrovEuZ2E7Z5VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:30 AM Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> wrote:
> > Commit 6afb10267c1692 ("pinctrl/amd: fix masking of GPIO interrupts")
> > changed to the clearing of interrupt status bits to a RMW in a critical
> > section. This works, but is a bit overkill.
> >
> > The relevant interrupt/wake status bits are in the Most Significant Byte
> > of a 32-bit word. These two are the only write-able bits in this byte.
>
> I don't have the hardware to test this any more, and I also don't have
> any docs to double if those are really the only writable bits, but
> looking at the existing driver code it does seem to be the case.
>
> I think you should retain the comment noting that the value of the
> register may have changed since it was read just a few lines above
> (and hence explaining more precisely why we make the special effort
> just to modify the MSB), just in case there is further rework of this
> code in future and we end up walking into the same trap. It was one of
> those issues that took a frustratingly long time to figure out...
Sounds reasonable. How about:
- /* Clear interrupt.
- * We must read the pin register again, in case the
- * value was changed while executing
- * generic_handle_irq() above.
+ /*
+ * Write-1-to-clear irq/wake status bits in MSByte.
+ * All other bits in this byte are read-only.
+ * This avoids modifying the lower 24-bits
because they may have
+ * changed while executing generic_handle_irq() above.
*/
>
> Thanks
> Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-17 0:57 [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl/amd: only handle irq if it is pending and unmasked Daniel Kurtz
2018-07-17 0:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl/amd: use byte access to clear irq/wake status bits Daniel Kurtz
2018-07-17 12:30 ` Daniel Drake
2018-07-20 23:38 ` Daniel Kurtz [this message]
2018-07-24 12:29 ` Daniel Drake
2018-07-19 14:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl/amd: only handle irq if it is pending and unmasked Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-29 20:44 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGS+omDPkC=Tv7SJ91cLxrFnab_VPC3VZRAugkvAUokkkoYSTg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=djkurtz@chromium.org \
--cc=Ken.Xue@amd.com \
--cc=Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=drake@endlessm.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).