From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A20C4363A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B33722263 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="qPVb71XN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1781850AbgJZOnX (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:43:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f67.google.com ([209.85.216.67]:51105 "EHLO mail-pj1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1781849AbgJZOnX (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:43:23 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f67.google.com with SMTP id p21so3362314pju.0 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:43:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iB6W1YRGfACToPxj/ygoH3yqEA0d31y7OSOhA2AlbSc=; b=qPVb71XNGYrz0GF3747rwA8bCX5f6Ik6gtrhRbspMTWzHbsZnYvz1Q2xx4N3SZQ+FK I0brk/70jL/pH7CffrTYWIKhBLoFZFtSFylu87kWpUhrXGdV5jOtqRPeT1uzHka/xb2n Q1vNdIXH3fkLFi7WrJSmY0gmxowOOyjgb5FNWOKui4epV8nORFOv3cwkxrt7+UDk/3tg tn8atmtZxlnVzh2K3nxHQ9GBf2twDOamVeH2d9NGGYYyMqqT409RwP0Uyp4ce/65gwqA X9vfLqK9OOLETbKrR5t5k2RdHQwqmvKfYZIjQ9gGcTxk+wpcH/eFv7T0C5duA3d9s/Eb bevw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iB6W1YRGfACToPxj/ygoH3yqEA0d31y7OSOhA2AlbSc=; b=tPECEhQG/IxRsUtjVp9IfErOmn8XGNZXojz6URVwxfyCI7liPdNuNy2u96Gf9gKua8 WMh6aLGXGXyxrCEfk9tPvOE2/JFFrrFcwnoua0BayO6d9mFWZXuHTZPl0r7RLLjhHsxt bBH50jCh7ZxGkJJf4TFp+xxxEEz+qBbG/Se4iOVlDH0BOx88H18RukyeLkIqcYwc8AmI jI3U8/qEmqTlZmMOscJ5ywP1v9fJ3Al3ZPrIvmZpPUvGrDb8KV+3ZUdcEUu3pIxrE8Xu eIep7nwvOs2SoABzNtUJMU4yttgZw6lqcaA0TiRi+8CO+dN3KBk/IEMCPFFyhlKaQb/O TjfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pEi5vwi593NfWtaO7tknrd9iEwqPNNq7v2qGAt8wY2ihpWl4t 6eX+d1hLeoJV3ND8AQg9TXRvJqTWOsSo7sJUCUY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwV5QSV0AMWcWTHLDkvFOYuUi+SNMzoP5HCC8LAQ71SEiaIkeZj0iFESIbCP5duMQU0sLkvx4gc89cLgQMLQhI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fb92:: with SMTP id cp18mr21029595pjb.228.1603723402832; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:43:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201022165847.56153-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20201022165847.56153-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:44:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] gpiolib: of: Use named item for enum gpiod_flags variable To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Andy Shevchenko , linux-gpio , Linus Walleij , Hans de Goede , Mika Westerberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:40 PM Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:58 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > Use named item instead of plain integer for enum gpiod_flags > > to make it clear that even 0 has its own meaning. > This patch doesn't seem to depend on the others in this series so I > applied it to my tree. Let me know if that's not the case. I'll let > you take the ACPI patches. It's fine, thanks! I have just sent an additional message to elaborate my vision, but again, the approach for this patch you chose is just fine. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko