From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DEEC433DB for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AE92311E for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726110AbhAGKMl (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2021 05:12:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44462 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725900AbhAGKMk (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2021 05:12:40 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABC23C0612F4 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 02:12:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id v19so4490501pgj.12 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 02:12:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bEhzAFMYoqhWzI2JJKPlqosKUzzYp7XADRpvHasmgU4=; b=SY7C1ytJhb45pshCtazGgdjSIPUMAokYiBE1+g95MxABzII3OcE2PQRAi3fLJ8UVWR Op0IqoPHRuPoE5y0bgFgMRE87W9TVljJ47xdXuCF3ZEWNUcjtBHfIZIgpl6RC/BLEVQu thiElPjFhUqAD9asBR17FEHztCcdiWb8My5jQYRbcKdiME4VYYI86Dv6mjwzKNks/1xJ pCMzuf2l9CABMYsTbckV8WTadgjTBtmRGbDU3JZxUKnsTldy/XLC5/B0vIomhaU3eUm7 DdxTjwGd4/ZR+k5jSqdfm09KA5U8tIpfHxrlGMdfABPYWXVVLxydIyNm0IAptJXEZZG2 SBxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bEhzAFMYoqhWzI2JJKPlqosKUzzYp7XADRpvHasmgU4=; b=KzlRyvkcFMJAPTBXzOkgmVxqdWaqZ9WSKZv0hj3dNb6WAohQOwKS3Ao0Kkvliz8uBs 0m8twBEP7t+77+CqUMo+2+cGt4U2G5yE6RfrvM8itWIBwWVYwMlRrJGSUHMO0YHpy/iO p7SthlQC9KVohbLCbQ1lWvErpJItre+7WnExuWaoCyzqaM5k/56oWyT3aA/yJ8i+aVMa kposescZfUX9dArYT1MwH48vGfXS+G/nMxSUMhTRLMAhnyc6kCYRxjHBctAPRwQmZtII ldbHPkaTYO9ksc+MIh8uHXbUERNTTdYURDMIf+FJOxoqRhiyWlNcrlo8aHQHDhzQVwgN K0YQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Y26nZ763evNPIZDxMb6t2Q/9I1hCCbkefIKfKeghCaBz+D9m0 oek8kUyf2H/TCxG97n5YNohX2XfSDoJj00rVO1I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDmIlKfpQzT70BnngpmSR/RojhxlSosRaQaUFSaT51Y6frl3xdrULkUlDIhXE5mUGV199Z3NNYvWGcOSLjWu8= X-Received: by 2002:a63:74b:: with SMTP id 72mr1163030pgh.4.1610014320292; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 02:12:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210105082758.77762-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 12:12:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: Disallow identical line names in the same chip To: Flavio Suligoi Cc: Linus Walleij , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Johan Hovold , Bartosz Golaszewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:03 PM Flavio Suligoi wrote: > > Flavio, perhaps one more rule to the gpio-line-names property has to > > be added into documentation (Bart, same to DT docs?): > > - names inside one chip must be unique > > ok, I'll add this rule Thanks! Main point for calling you is that you may tell that what you also assumed when assigned line names in your case(s). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko