From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3792C4361B for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE06225AB for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730343AbgLNPDR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:03:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50208 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725969AbgLNPDP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:03:15 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com (mail-io1-xd43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CD6CC0613D3 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:02:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id q137so17110973iod.9 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:02:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bgdev-pl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1Z+QVarofE1wEvfFu21bMC2eN+W3CZ93Xu6Vyj0YIko=; b=0ztrXdYgmEm0Fcaa868Cjp/0M4ugmUwORLAoSevHXYRIv7xvtwtRQnfeCA/3FeUhvv DKhPV8RHnwaqV5GFF5RhzdOsCodHWgWUvbFwr7vj5qwH1ScNR6sXVJUl+pAQZiYD5d+d AGIKLJT6qTkVcDzs691q4WLDqCK7UZaPR8LDOVTiQ6w1ug5B8Gw+DEvE+1FV/Xi+vWJF fhfPFRZRPfdPMOHYRgad4HpbXFWN4yABkLWYxwLNruiZieSHycNReH1eRJkneBhgz9I4 TXNJhoH/caY8R8yPyfqju0RrTmgqialbqP1S0UAe8yTRqvI+I4u1jPsttI6JLQYvmUYB FF8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1Z+QVarofE1wEvfFu21bMC2eN+W3CZ93Xu6Vyj0YIko=; b=DtaBObwt8BKq6T4CMbZ42Ivh3RhijgxBRnB0GP4noyKsWQDrus0i1Z/BzYm2ycznsD JgAZ01re/PRmdvylHQOFouGz0CDYRDR721KvpSRvjOXapHLX8j6/WrwMvr2cx3x8CKVN f/68G5DTKoAe24YlzQ2fiai4Q5pa3YLpq/3BnninSL2AuE2mToMYJdZ3npc5VbVJIZ7E Tubv4R0Do+ON1z5Fnlgx8dJiFapZ+hHFvGatwXmAreK+0n+I8/Rou5xEoJrz73mQq0u6 Aj03njKS9VsCHRPHPRg11GlYBvBL8ANoOnF4jCzofK6Lp6Ip0q0UiY05k5iOr7RpwRY+ UdSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ax2pztK7rSSuzKzG2MOGi0DA3qCJKMUXq0vKUs2uC35DxYx+a /fbkaDRmMktOxrSowx9nG9Cx9/8vigoVMdKC2EZ+yg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxuP+cNCb2XzJgSxp4QHDkuyOGWSeDQKpLQirSLj/XhcJIPX5Dy7Ro9IuWjLFTWzQ7xEKzxt7MuA4XI5MJv3nE= X-Received: by 2002:a02:ac18:: with SMTP id a24mr33386364jao.24.1607958153906; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:02:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201210132315.5785-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20201210135627.GH4077@smile.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201210135627.GH4077@smile.fi.intel.com> From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:02:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [libgpiod][PATCH 00/14] treewide: start shaving off cruft for v2.0 To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Kent Gibson , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jack Winch , Helmut Grohne , Linus Walleij , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Bartosz Golaszewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:55 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 02:23:01PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > > > The following series removes a lot of interfaces that were deemed overkill > > in libgpiod and the removal of which was suggested to me before proceeding > > with the new API. > > > > This leaves a couple holes in the library but we'll follow them up with > > more improvements all over the tree. We'll create a new object called > > gpiod_request for dealing with line requests of arbitrary size. We'll > > probably remove the the bulk objects from bindings and eventually we'll > > switch to using the v2 kernel uAPI. > > > > Andy - a note for you: I know you're always very thorough in your reviews > > but in this case let's consider this series preparing a construction zone > > for the new API. Please don't nitpick too much. :) > > I don't know what you are talking about. The series looks nice, esp. taking > into account statistics! FWIW, > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > I applied the series so that we can move on. Since we're now getting per-chip unique lines, we'll probably have to redesign line lookup again but that's alright. Bartosz