From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9545BC433E0 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 07:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438BC23104 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 07:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725837AbhAFH2g (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 02:28:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47586 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725789AbhAFH2g (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 02:28:36 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD09C06134D for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:27:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id ga15so3838700ejb.4 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 23:27:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xGW/hKcgThQrkDmp4/Nq73y8NgwE8XDkGF7zvIldMrM=; b=A2KNk3AHTmJlI18STPME1Sa6t9gc1Ftvw7b31H8Vj39YjusgeaU0c1ypsqit52yWFF 3eQGLVMgPfhF0tcCbEJmm3HsNCJ0zZ8NG3JRTyPKW7OXNUZNMMniS0bT/7ndVqBa7b3q FNEjNtzso2oFjWRDBWdctZ8/UBVolbVcrg/o27xs67qQd0Kl0+7v6and6KXS4zT0IDGo L8nHoW7UNQO5cliDlHgM3DAezmy7JMyVE7cZk2uzueStSK5Zefr34N8UH/sgVW6YOIjG mkROA3nUh248uHrjhIU+cLDXpa2DbIJKN7YqY8L5/rgwpwStSYsD7b1Mvy7MEYO2VlnD LaHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xGW/hKcgThQrkDmp4/Nq73y8NgwE8XDkGF7zvIldMrM=; b=Yg3GQduzrrUIYv1Ab/yuBrgtDsoiX5t/zPr7ZS9sqZPdzNMIi1T4pr2CsYk7sZzn4H ThMyJII6E5gOVMFMrA4xsSTDIwkDSFKycneVwM10SBbVFryVko2+b8Ag+D9mJ27XtGna rahYHrO2Q9u9ipdV9g/jDlM+PjYFtz9hcz+y92+voA/N9LiYbXgkudr5QbTUdS9tufFg 8wXLU+SHOjZRUzM5GN9dyUKV0sbW/4GEHCuexaK59UHWmM40Mg+E46LZ7RePDEEhjVtr vUt6M7Ox9a/tuo0a9xwG0lzOsQXI1lYkQ/r4YHXg5TX0NF1SOU9bmxAFm7OMuRLxpqOy 0oyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Z2tK7JTKAItFSmfOiiRY3C7IhaHJPg/LQqh4KRxGjLbZSjm63 btkfD6OFQsPHXqQo6gPEsXBXaFLydUK8DYdQXORLIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYjz8N2N+aC7hTbxtGQy//7rOVk9vuZpXjappd1ywiMkx0G+q8sv1KN8h2TqqcyRgEkKycqJpY3pGZKSJx6nY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3a55:: with SMTP id a21mr2057000ejf.516.1609918074173; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 23:27:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210105143921.GL4077@smile.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210105143921.GL4077@smile.fi.intel.com> From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:27:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Linus Walleij , Syed Nayyar Waris , William Breathitt Gray , Michal Simek , Arnd Bergmann , Robert Richter , Masahiro Yamada , Andrew Morton , Zhang Rui , Daniel Lezcano , "(Exiting) Amit Kucheria" , Linux-Arch , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux ARM , Linux PM list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:38 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 03:19:13PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:27 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 7:41 AM Syed Nayyar Waris wrote: > > > > > > > Since this patchset primarily affects GPIO drivers, would you like > > > > to pick it up through your GPIO tree? > > > > > > Actually Bartosz is handling the GPIO patches for v5.12. > > > I tried to merge the patch series before but failed for > > > various reasons. > > > My info on this is a bit outdated - didn't Linus Torvalds reject these > > patches from Andrew Morton's PR? Or am I confusing this series with > > something else? > > Linus T. told that it can be done inside GPIO realm. This version tries > (badly in my opinion) to achieve that. > I'm seeing William and Arnd have some unaddressed issues with patch 1 (with using __builtin_unreachable()). Admittedly I didn't follow the previous iterations too much so I may miss some history behind it. Why do the first two patches go into lib if this is supposed to be gpiolib-only? Bartosz