From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Drop CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:14:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUANNFNt6yuTEcadkdVhKHDmVAVofWOfFpW-r2wkL=vdQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+ASDXOOzECbCBoehKjmFjLTtsssk9AH1NabA=FSRvoVWp8KMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Brian,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:19 AM Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 3:23 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:00 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> > > I like it. It's true we don't see many of those DEBUG constructs
> > > anymore nowadays and overhead for might_sleep() and WARN_ON() is
> > > negligible.
> >
> > I agree. I have something similar for pinctrl, maybe that needs to
> > go too.
>
> Huh, yeah, CONFIG_DEBUG_PINCTRL does look awfully similar, and I just
> didn't notice because we don't happen to have it enabled for Chromium
> kernels. We happen to have CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO enabled though, and the
> "new" rockchip-gpio log messages triggered me :)
>
> I guess one difference is that CONFIG_DEBUG_PINCTRL is almost
> exclusively (aside from some renesas drivers?) about extra logging and
> less about interesting checks that one might want to enable in more
> general settings. So it's a clearer call to make that people generally
> want it disabled.
For the Renesas pinctrl drivers, it enables sanity checks on the pin
control tables, which you definitely do not want in your production
kernel.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-22 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 23:09 [PATCH] gpio: Drop CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO Brian Norris
2022-03-14 15:00 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-03-14 22:22 ` Linus Walleij
2022-03-14 22:34 ` Brian Norris
2022-03-22 13:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2022-03-22 14:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-22 14:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-22 14:49 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-03-22 14:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-22 16:31 ` Brian Norris
2022-03-23 15:11 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-03-23 20:44 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMuHMdUANNFNt6yuTEcadkdVhKHDmVAVofWOfFpW-r2wkL=vdQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=jay.xu@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).