linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
To: mtk15103 <hailong.fan@mediatek.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	youlin.pei@mediatek.com,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	Chen-Tsung Hsieh <chentsung@chromium.org>,
	gtk_pangao@mediatek.com, Hanks Chen <hanks.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
	zhengnan.chen@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: mediatek: Fix trigger type setting follow for unexpected interrupt
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:54:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANMq1KDa_aO_wtQAZofruN7r7BuvRTNGKkmfgTf2oM7ab9425g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1611283438.2493.23.camel@mhfsdcap03>

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:44 AM mtk15103 <hailong.fan@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 20:13 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:09 PM mtk15103 <hailong.fan@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 16:55 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:52 PM Hailong Fan <hailong.fan@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > When flipping the polarity will be generated interrupt under certain
> > > > > circumstances, but GPIO external signal has not changed.
> > > > > Then, mask the interrupt before polarity setting, and clear the
> > > > > unexpected interrupt after trigger type setting completed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Hailong Fan <hailong.fan@mediatek.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Resend since some server reject.
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> > > > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> > > > > index 22736f60c16c..3acda6bb401e 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> > > > > @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static void mtk_eint_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> > > > >  static int mtk_eint_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >         struct mtk_eint *eint = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> > > > > +       unsigned int unmask;
> > > >
> > > > bool?
> > > Yes,thanks.
> > > >
> > > > >         u32 mask = BIT(d->hwirq & 0x1f);
> > > > >         void __iomem *reg;
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -173,6 +174,13 @@ static int mtk_eint_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > > > >         else
> > > > >                 eint->dual_edge[d->hwirq] = 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > +       if (!mtk_eint_get_mask(eint, d->hwirq)) {
> > > > > +               mtk_eint_mask(d);
> > > > > +               unmask = 1;
> > > > > +       } else {
> > > > > +               unmask = 0;
> > > > > +       }
> > > > > +
> > > > >         if (type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)) {
> > > > >                 reg = mtk_eint_get_offset(eint, d->hwirq, eint->regs->pol_clr);
> > > > >                 writel(mask, reg);
> > > > > @@ -189,8 +197,9 @@ static int mtk_eint_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > > > >                 writel(mask, reg);
> > > > >         }
> > > > >
> > > > > -       if (eint->dual_edge[d->hwirq])
> > > > > -               mtk_eint_flip_edge(eint, d->hwirq);
> > > >
> > > > Why are you dropping this? Aren't we at risk to miss the first edge
> > > > after mtk_eint_set_type is called?
> > > mtk_eint_unmask() will do it.
> > > If unmask != 1, user need to call mtk_eint_unmask() to enable the
> > > interrupt before use it, thanks.
> >
> > Makes sense, I just have one more worry:
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c#L122
> >
> > mtk_eint_unmask unmasks the interrupt _before_ the edge is flipped,
> > could this cause a spurious interrupt? On any unmask operation -- not
> > just on mtk_eint_set_type (so this is technically another problem,
> > that should be fixed as a separate patch)
>
> This situation will not happen.
>
> Spurious interrupt occur condition: edge irq polarity value is same with
> input signal.
> e.g.
> Default value: GPIO input is high, trigger type is falling_edge.
> User want modify trigger type is rising_edge under some certain
> circumstances, it will generate spurious interrupt but external signal
> maintain high.
> So we need ack interrupt after trigger_type setting is completed.
>
> mtk_eint_flip_edge is for dual_edge, the polarity setting based on
> current gpio input signal:
> if (input == high)
>         polarity = low; /* falling_edge */
> else
>         polarity = high; /* rising_edge */
> Then it's not cause a spurious interrupt.

Okay let me try to make sure I follow:

- Say interrupt is currently IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING (and GPIO is high and stable)
- mtk_eint_set_type(d, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
- mtk_eint_mask(d)
- (no mask changed, just eint->dual_edge)
- mtk_eint_ack(d) (not actually needed in this example)
- mtk_eint_unmask(d)
  - HW reg unmask (can't generate an interrupt as anything that would
have happened is acked already -- even with different previous/new
types than my example)
  - flip_edge (will swap polarity as needed but can't generate
interrupt as it won't set the polarity to be the same as the current
GPIO state)

Okay, I think I'm convinced.

Please fix the nits and then you can add

Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>

> > > > > +       mtk_eint_ack(d);
> > > > > +       if (unmask == 1)
> > > >
> > > > Just `if (unmask)`
> > > Yes,thanks.
> > > > > +               mtk_eint_unmask(d);
> > > > >
> > > > >         return 0;
> > > > >  }
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.18.0
> > >
>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21  7:51 [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: mediatek: Fix trigger type setting follow for unexpected interrupt Hailong Fan
2021-01-21  8:55 ` Nicolas Boichat
     [not found]   ` <1611230975.2493.17.camel@mhfsdcap03>
2021-01-21 12:13     ` Nicolas Boichat
     [not found]       ` <1611283438.2493.23.camel@mhfsdcap03>
2021-01-22 10:54         ` Nicolas Boichat [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANMq1KDa_aO_wtQAZofruN7r7BuvRTNGKkmfgTf2oM7ab9425g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=chentsung@chromium.org \
    --cc=gtk_pangao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=hailong.fan@mediatek.com \
    --cc=hanks.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean.wang@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    --cc=zhengnan.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).