Re: [libgpiod][PATCH 3/3] bindings: rust: bump major for libgpiod crate

["Erik Schilling" <erik.schilling@linaro.org>]

On Fri Sep 29, 2023 at 2:43 PM CEST, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:30 PM Erik Schilling
> <erik.schilling@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Since the type changes around ownership of line_info instances are not
> > necessarily transparent to the user, we bump the major for the next
> > release of the crate.
> >
> > Note:
> > I am using the term "major" as defined in the Rust SemVer compatibility
> > guide [1], where the first non-zero digit is considered as "major".
> >
> > [1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/semver.html
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Erik Schilling <erik.schilling@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  bindings/rust/libgpiod/Cargo.toml | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/bindings/rust/libgpiod/Cargo.toml b/bindings/rust/libgpiod/Cargo.toml
> > index 518e5e5..3be4aa0 100644
> > --- a/bindings/rust/libgpiod/Cargo.toml
> > +++ b/bindings/rust/libgpiod/Cargo.toml
> > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> >
> >  [package]
> >  name = "libgpiod"
> > -version = "0.1.0"
> > +version = "0.2.0"
> >  authors = ["Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>"]
> >  description = "libgpiod wrappers"
> >  repository = "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libgpiod/libgpiod.git"
> >
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
>
> Isn't it something that we should do right before tagging the release
> once we know the final requirement for the version change? At least
> this is what I do for the rest of libgpiod.

Yep. Probably thats better. Then we can also use that as a signal of
intended publish to crates.io.

Will drop from this series and send again once all current Rust patches
landed.

- Erik