From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 0/4] bindings: implement python bindings for libgpiod v2
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:41:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0a2Fdyhh+urE97R@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Md_5cThJwu7iLW14XP=8hADBmOk2DYt2axuG=jWa-jkcA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 02:34:44PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 4:55 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > This is the third iteration of python bindings for libgpiod but it really has
> > very little in common with the previous version.
> >
> > This time the code has been split into high-level python and low-level
> > C layers with the latter only doing the bare minimum.
> >
> > The data model is mostly based on the C++ one with the main difference
> > being utilizing dynamic typing and keyword arguments in place of the
> > builder pattern. That allows us to reduce the number of methods and
> > objects.
> >
> > Because python doesn't have RAII, unlike C++, we provide a module-level
> > request_lines() helper as gpiod.Chip(path).request_lines(...) one-liner
> > could lead to the chip left dangling even after the last reference is
> > dropped.
> >
> > Because python forces us to dynamically allocate objects all the time even
> > for fundamental types (which are also immutable) there's no point in trying
> > to replicate the edge-event buffer. Instead LineRequest.read_edge_event()
> > just returns a list of events.
> >
> > Bartosz Golaszewski (4):
> >
>
> I fixed the one nit from Andy. If there are no objections I'd like to
> apply this and squash the entire v2 patch series into one big commit
> and apply it to the master branch. This way we can stop keeping this
> temporary branch and continue the development (tools, rust, possible
> further tweaks to the API) on master.
>
I'm in the process of reviewing, so hold off for a bit if you can.
If not, at the very least IIIIpdII -> IIIIpkII in patch 4.
Otherwise you get this on 32 bit platforms:
$ gpioget.py /dev/gpiochip0 17
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
Cheers,
Kent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-12 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-07 14:55 [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 0/4] bindings: implement python bindings for libgpiod v2 Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-07 14:55 ` [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 1/4] bindings: python: remove old version Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-07 14:55 ` [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 2/4] bindings: python: add examples Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-13 3:09 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-17 12:00 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-17 12:11 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-17 13:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 14:07 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-17 14:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 15:53 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-17 16:09 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-17 16:20 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-17 16:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 16:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 17:26 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-17 16:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 16:39 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-07 14:55 ` [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 3/4] bindings: python: add tests Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-13 3:09 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-07 14:55 ` [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 4/4] bindings: python: implement python bindings for libgpiod v2 Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-07 15:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-07 18:19 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-13 3:10 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-13 11:12 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-26 12:32 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-26 12:56 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-12 12:34 ` [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 0/4] bindings: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-12 12:41 ` Kent Gibson [this message]
2022-10-12 12:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-12 13:03 ` Kent Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y0a2Fdyhh+urE97R@sol \
--to=warthog618@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).