linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, brgl@bgdev.pl, liwei391@huawei.com,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix memory leak in gpiochip_setup_dev
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:57:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2qKjPD8zcmybugm@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221108115324.270361-1-zengheng4@huawei.com>

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 07:53:24PM +0800, Zeng Heng wrote:
> gcdev_register & gcdev_unregister call device_add & device_del to
> request/release source. But in device_add, the dev->p allocated by
> device_private_init is not released by device_del.
> 
> So when calling gcdev_unregister to release gdev, it needs put_device
> to release dev in the following.
> 
> Otherwise, kmemleak would report memory leak such as below:
> 
> unreferenced object 0xffff88810b406400 (size 512):
>   comm "python3", pid 1682, jiffies 4295346908 (age 24.090s)
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00  .....N..........
>     ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff a0 5e 23 90 ff ff ff ff  .........^#.....
>   backtrace:
>     [<00000000a58ee5fe>] kmalloc_trace+0x22/0x110
>     [<0000000045fe2058>] device_add+0xb34/0x1130
>     [<00000000d778b45f>] cdev_device_add+0x83/0xe0
>     [<0000000089f948ed>] gpiolib_cdev_register+0x73/0xa0
>     [<00000000a3a8a316>] gpiochip_setup_dev+0x1c/0x70
>     [<00000000787227b4>] gpiochip_add_data_with_key+0x10f6/0x1bf0
>     [<000000009ac5742c>] devm_gpiochip_add_data_with_key+0x2e/0x80
>     [<00000000bf2b23d9>] xra1403_probe+0x192/0x1b0 [gpio_xra1403]
>     [<000000005b5ef2d4>] spi_probe+0xe1/0x140
>     [<000000002b26f6f1>] really_probe+0x17c/0x3f0
>     [<00000000dd2dad9c>] __driver_probe_device+0xe3/0x170
>     [<000000005ca60d2a>] device_driver_attach+0x34/0x80
>     [<00000000e9db90db>] bind_store+0x10b/0x1a0
>     [<00000000e2650f8a>] drv_attr_store+0x49/0x70
>     [<0000000080a80b2b>] sysfs_kf_write+0x8c/0xb0
>     [<00000000a28b45b9>] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x216/0x2e0
> 
> unreferenced object 0xffff888100de9800 (size 512):
>   comm "python3", pid 264, jiffies 4294737615 (age 33.514s)
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00  .....N..........
>     ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff a0 5e 63 a1 ff ff ff ff  .........^c.....
>   backtrace:
>     [<00000000bcc571d0>] kmalloc_trace+0x22/0x110
>     [<00000000eeb06124>] device_add+0xb34/0x1130
>     [<000000007e5cd2fd>] cdev_device_add+0x83/0xe0
>     [<000000008f6bcd3a>] gpiolib_cdev_register+0x73/0xa0
>     [<0000000012c93b24>] gpiochip_setup_dev+0x1c/0x70
>     [<00000000a24b646a>] gpiochip_add_data_with_key+0x10f6/0x1bf0
>     [<000000000c225212>] tpic2810_probe+0x16e/0x196 [gpio_tpic2810]
>     [<00000000b52d04ff>] i2c_device_probe+0x651/0x680
>     [<0000000058d3ff6b>] really_probe+0x17c/0x3f0
>     [<00000000586f43d3>] __driver_probe_device+0xe3/0x170
>     [<000000003f428602>] device_driver_attach+0x34/0x80
>     [<0000000040e91a1b>] bind_store+0x10b/0x1a0
>     [<00000000c1d990b9>] drv_attr_store+0x49/0x70
>     [<00000000a23bfc22>] sysfs_kf_write+0x8c/0xb0
>     [<00000000064e6572>] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x216/0x2e0
>     [<00000000026ce093>] vfs_write+0x658/0x810
> 
> Because at the point of gpiochip_setup_dev here, where dev.release
> does not set yet, calling put_device would cause the warning of
> no release function and double-free in the following fault handler
> route (when kfree dev_name). So directly calling kfree to release
> dev->p here in case of memory leak.
> 
> Fixes: 1f5eb8b17f02 ("gpiolib: fix sysfs when cdev is not selected")

I'm confused. You say "gcdev_register & gcdev_unregister call device_add
& device_del" - which is only the case when CONFIG_GPIO_CDEV is not set.

But your trace shows CONFIG_GPIO_CDEV is set, as otherwise
gpiolib_cdev_register() would not exist.

Can you clarify the configuration in which you are seeing the problem?

Assuming CONFIG_GPIO_CDEV is NOT set:

Provide a more appropriate trace.

From a reading of the device_add() documentation, there is a problem if
the device_add() fails - in that case put_device() should be called - and
it is not, instead gpiochip_setup_dev() returns immediately - not going
via the err_remove_device path where your fix is??.
The correct fix for that would be to change the gcdev_register() to call
put_device() if device_add() fails.

Cheers,
Kent.

> Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 4756ea08894f..fa659af86d07 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ static int gpiochip_setup_dev(struct gpio_device *gdev)
>  
>  err_remove_device:
>  	gcdev_unregister(gdev);
> +	kfree(gdev->dev.p);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-08 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-08 11:53 [PATCH] gpiolib: fix memory leak in gpiochip_setup_dev Zeng Heng
2022-11-08 16:57 ` Kent Gibson [this message]
2022-11-09  5:12   ` Kent Gibson
2022-11-09  8:27     ` Zeng Heng
2022-11-09  9:06       ` Kent Gibson
2022-11-09  9:31         ` [PATCH v2] " Zeng Heng
2022-11-09 14:47           ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-10  1:26             ` Kent Gibson
2022-11-10  2:36               ` Zeng Heng
2022-11-17  9:02                 ` [PATCH v3] gpiolib: fix memory leak in gpiochip_setup_dev() Zeng Heng
2022-11-17 10:49                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-17 14:12                     ` Zeng Heng
2022-11-17 15:31                       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-18  2:22                         ` [PATCH v4] " Zeng Heng
2022-11-18 10:28                           ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-18  2:31                         ` [PATCH v3] " Zeng Heng
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-09  7:21 [PATCH] gpiolib: fix memory leak in gpiochip_setup_dev Yuan Can

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2qKjPD8zcmybugm@sol \
    --to=warthog618@gmail.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
    --cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).