From: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@ti.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: <vigneshr@ti.com>, <robh@kernel.org>, <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
<linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <lee@kernel.org>, <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Documentation: ti,tps6594: Add DT bindings for the TPS6594x PMIC
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:23:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3haUxShWtA4x8dy@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b46253e0-6678-0a69-1522-83a559835669@linaro.org>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:21:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/11/2022 10:22, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> > Add documentation for the TPS6594x PMIC including its RTC and GPIO
> > functionalities.
> >
>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
> requested changes or keep discussing them.
>
I missed serveral feedback suggestions in the last revision. Will try to be
a little more careful in the future.
> Thank you.
>
> The comment was about proper subject prefix. Drop also redundant, second
> "DT bindings" from the subject.
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@ti.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..81613bcef39d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/ti,tps6594x.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: TPS6594x Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC)
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - ti,tps6594
>
> tps6594 is the model name? So what was previous tps6594x used also in
> title? This does not look correct.
>
So the actual part number is TPS6594-Q1. Would tps6594q1 be more concise
for naming across the device tree, and drivers?
- Matt
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + const: 0x48
> > +
> > + ti,system-power-controller:
> > + type: boolean
> > + description: PMIC is controlling the system power.
> > +
> > + rtc:
> > + type: object
> > + $ref: /schemas/rtc/rtc.yaml#
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: ti,tps6594-rtc
>
> Same problem.
>
> > +
> > + gpio:
> > + type: object
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: ti,tps6594x-gpio
>
>
> Not fixed.
>
>
>
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + i2c0 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + pmic: pmic@48 {
> > + compatible = "ti,tps6594";
> > + reg = <0x48>;
> > +
> > + rtc {
> > + compatible = "ti,tps6594-rtc";
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio {
> > + compatible = "ti,tps6594-gpio";
>
> Does not look like you tested the bindings. Please run `make
> dt_binding_check` (see
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions).
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-19 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-18 9:22 [PATCH v4 0/4] mfd: add tps6594x support for Jacinto platforms Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] Documentation: ti,tps6594: Add DT bindings for the TPS6594x PMIC Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 10:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-19 4:23 ` Matt Ranostay [this message]
2022-11-18 13:31 ` Rob Herring
2022-11-18 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] MFD: TPS6594x: Add new PMIC device driver for TPS6594x chips Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 10:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-19 4:17 ` Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] rtc: rtc-tps6594x: Add support for TPS6594X PMIC RTC Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] gpio: gpio-tps6594x: add GPIO support for TPS6594x PMIC Matt Ranostay
2022-11-28 18:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-11-28 20:38 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3haUxShWtA4x8dy@ubuntu \
--to=mranostay@ti.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).