From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CB0C4167B for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234011AbiLTSb1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 13:31:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58986 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233392AbiLTSa6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 13:30:58 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D94961E3E2; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:30:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id c7so9052885pfc.12; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:30:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vFul2piKoOn4GgC+2pw875qXMJqBOKHFpKQIXO36SXM=; b=qELjIaIRXg4xWIc7aVjnv+T7xE//R23dslwzmRIF2UCKr/pDKC5nOd+8aQBe3hnmdm iSHCLhZHWMCPBI5jIG3BLjraizJzWRzeX5pFmyh6K9kQwQkprsAyrlEKlAL6oiwpPat3 Fe62dea+66WCvu3GuMCtCE1zzaMFxkxEep5evLP2m3HQH4akVAyTWuWCvM0PBxlgNHcX ZYo+d3vVs07l+JSN4mD+mNx7ROzaoVwY0H0InsjgGiKhYXunbvZhge4Nm3hjdj+5cUhx 7wT5QORArZHpPKsvmPgXry6tjyfC1Tcixq3zzJWjl3giydUqmaSL//z+Cm1SjeER3P1W xsDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=vFul2piKoOn4GgC+2pw875qXMJqBOKHFpKQIXO36SXM=; b=hd4K23CLMsJv6MqJvDVWVB7evEdc2UBU8bTqWdQfMsnOZ1+pxpwyWitlvw1uP9KFNO 7WmfVPmvx6Cflbq+H/6r7Wmc6FRkIVOMCv4SAyRtGVavMxitH/CR+mdd7F1d2CSYSOBL LBrw1Vw9H/PW2BGkPYnr/y8D+xSHkQLqgMpF45B7ZtBWojLUXXyqXUjuJ8jiiPNeA3qE ljz9DZwodOeTv6Cz5Pi1ymAa1IG3X5q/6X1RIIheliWUPbhF7ZB86xxSxJ7LXa1u3RrW R32JwdYxYcsmVabxm5nIpcg1FZlPOK7Wm5lpnmlV5hh2CBVB2Hho6t5+pwBRU4IIUdWS eAsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkqhNXrXnMjfq83IkCHvRxjYeo6bwoCRSUy1/+Pb/GUjoDc6mRp kATm1D5Dm4HlsUulMuw2BC0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7n7+L65qrQuRCXFfBhi1Y/xRHdhn8gIL0qUNup1d0TQWRGuJPfaBs2mcbLbTA/+lHn8d4Uwg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8554:0:b0:578:5b4:49a6 with SMTP id y20-20020aa78554000000b0057805b449a6mr43329353pfn.12.1671561024158; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:30:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:9d:2:7206:404e:4820:d175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v18-20020a62a512000000b0057622e8e82csm8942573pfm.191.2022.12.20.10.30.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:30:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:30:20 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] gpiolib: of: remove [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node() APIs Message-ID: References: <20221219192016.1396950-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> <20221219192016.1396950-5-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 04:01:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 11:20:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Now that everyone is using [devm_]fwnode_gpiod_get[_index]() APIs, > > remove OF-specific [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node(). > > I very much in favour of this change! > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > > But the same question reminds, how this is possible to exists with the removed > of_get_named_gpiod_flags()? As I mentioned in the other email of_get_named_gpiod_flags() is still present, it is of_get_named_gpio_flags (without the "d") that was removed. Thanks. -- Dmitry