From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A20DC25B0E for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 09:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237704AbiHLJtO (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2022 05:49:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35876 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229966AbiHLJtN (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2022 05:49:13 -0400 Received: from muru.com (muru.com [72.249.23.125]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7CFA5C69; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 02:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E89D080E1; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 09:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 12:49:11 +0300 From: Tony Lindgren To: Saravana Kannan Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Andy Shevchenko , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Len Brown , Abel Vesa , Alexander Stein , Sudeep Holla , Geert Uytterhoeven , John Stultz , Doug Anderson , Guenter Roeck , kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] fw_devlink improvements Message-ID: References: <20220810060040.321697-1-saravanak@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220810060040.321697-1-saravanak@google.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org * Saravana Kannan [220810 05:54]: > Tony, > > This should handle the odd case of the child being the supplier of the > parent. Can you please give this a shot? I want to make sure the cycle > detection code handles this properly and treats it like it's NOT a cycle. Yup, this series works for me, so feel free to add: Tested-by: Tony Lindgren I have some concerns though on how do we get a working -rc1 with the earlier series applied? See the comments in the last patch of this series. Regards, Tony