Re: [PATCH v3 01/20] driver core: Split devres APIs to device/devres.h

[Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:27:03AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Raag,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on 2014c95afecee3e76ca4a56956a936e23283f05b]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Raag-Jadav/driver-core-Split-devres-APIs-to-device-devres-h/20250203-161554
> base:   2014c95afecee3e76ca4a56956a936e23283f05b
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250203080902.1864382-2-raag.jadav%40intel.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v3 01/20] driver core: Split devres APIs to device/devres.h
> config: um-randconfig-r112-20250205 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250206/202502060025.XJwUub6I-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 355d0b186f178668b103068537e517f3d52ad639)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250206/202502060025.XJwUub6I-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502060025.XJwUub6I-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>    drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs-plat.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/device.h):
> >> include/linux/device/devres.h:106:23: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different address spaces) @@     expected void [noderef] __iomem * @@     got void * @@
>    include/linux/device/devres.h:106:23: sparse:     expected void [noderef] __iomem *
>    include/linux/device/devres.h:106:23: sparse:     got void *
> 
> vim +106 include/linux/device/devres.h
> 
>    102	
>    103	static inline
>    104	void __iomem *devm_ioremap_resource(struct device *dev, const struct resource *res)
>    105	{
>  > 106		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>    107	}
>    108	

Andy, are we expecting this?

Raag