From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1319B1DFF7; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742563363; cv=none; b=EvLDXYWuy72Md/xIN6OmX2zIuurfm9+UdhWd745DzRcNxjD3ebZoU4vXaRdweKuyuRKdI48Ra7J+21ojBdMcMCfV60XjzhdMen56h2vOGEDLbpv9aawdaSTEOJbLbyHV3vlQQrBeG6tbOSw6iKc8nXSSSTdfWMoG3CRuI52EqBU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742563363; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cUsg8Wa/PpL9JmY8Y/dmKT8tlFCy6iKHRU18BFHKJpc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mSq0fSf+T+fXzEYVeiruWn6XjP0nWoCnP7e7XomhCV2zMbJDqumczFIt/6cUNKlVTYCW76msKefsW9BkDKcaODRbZLJZ7Ltj7uBxbuVk7Jrtt3UdLS/YLDDsscexPqwBSh1k73D/au5yrH7VA+eLvvkANQQqLvouFN0Hb1J9SkM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=j0HJmnM5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="j0HJmnM5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1742563362; x=1774099362; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=cUsg8Wa/PpL9JmY8Y/dmKT8tlFCy6iKHRU18BFHKJpc=; b=j0HJmnM5PevYlofZnzXLJxeasx5K4Ut3RNr1W82PGTfM+D52ZKyn3UXa EM1NQFXlyVxb4FJ6aKJbqwAH5wnBLgJKKy/Xc6zYJd6znP6YY8wYOiXKG 46wYo4ASFgr83p4MV6hGk/fNwmSx9zzQay7IndsxRxecfMjrFg2SK/tpp f6wQAezGMwnRcmhb/AGn82yos6CF9096HinDOXH9uN8Lk/OsBdON/nWFE OmYLh8/UunNH9WIDf1tSEJhIeA+Fl9C+gol76W0oZh9g2DAaCxF6wTXlX z/8kUnaSIkn9+rg6yA5jwuBW3vIFFy4oWsdYibbY216r6RImiwoN9wzHP A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8p8VmrBMTTiiXT3DN5z6dw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zaJyLfY7QlmBSZ0B680Pkw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11380"; a="55212052" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,264,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="55212052" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Mar 2025 06:22:41 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TUPN8X8ETeGjJn6DcPWV6A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: iM5eLvNwR12DMvpwbYyoXQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,264,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="123860821" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Mar 2025 06:22:39 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tvcKa-00000004WQp-1AAK; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:22:36 +0200 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:22:36 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Greg KH Cc: Raag Jadav , Lee Jones , giometti@enneenne.com, raymond.tan@intel.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] mfd: intel_ehl_pse_gpio: Introduce Intel Elkhart Lake PSE GPIO and TIO Message-ID: References: <20250307052231.551737-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20250307052231.551737-2-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20250314124450.GP3890718@google.com> <20250314135735.GQ3890718@google.com> <2025032115-gloomily-cubbyhole-dd8e@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2025032115-gloomily-cubbyhole-dd8e@gregkh> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 06:04:38AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 07:28:22AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 01:57:35PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Mar 2025, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > > Also, Greg has been quite vocal about converting PCI devices to Platform > > > ones in the past. We may wish to run this past him before continuing. > > > > Greg, any objections on moving forward with platform device? > > I have no context here at all, why would a PCI device EVER be a platform > device? That feels wrong on so many levels... It's a multi-functional device, in other words that device provides a set of (dependent or independent) subdevices. But do you have other suggestion? The auxiliary bus? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko