From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B019A1386DA; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 18:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741804378; cv=none; b=TBHR68wn1dMvtBMmhNAa1+tsjjmAr/PLpbcZy+9nM4j+CR8sAafEt57PbHiUrVFum8ju/OiR6yFgPmNatMmZTmQO2R1veTtwrI38/iBrxPt5JLxPGBx/JWNJQ1e6BC4ksvx8y/mLyxiI3rXcRGohDgQuDXzdqvgA8B9o/PC9JwM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741804378; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Amk2MJ1qHizSFYK6muVFDeoaHdIBjfCUeF/dhRR+z/Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KY/8TFTXNu+Zsbh99U5korSglZZzbM7/db6QcG2ipf0Ca298PS2SiIIGRdW8L+vZZL+IFC4IWtT4qeFCNsC/DrR7fGpBT7SO19cxW769WhhhxtMAEMqJHUVmhWEOVVf+BcnZElkkMe/VDZtcoic+7GugvwSjUrOEglj/KZeN3gc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=HrqLFWKJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="HrqLFWKJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741804377; x=1773340377; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Amk2MJ1qHizSFYK6muVFDeoaHdIBjfCUeF/dhRR+z/Q=; b=HrqLFWKJgemKLoP7NWj/8oyLAIXVHoCgDOBiNq5pJv0Sb1X4aitFRT/t 4Wn/xGJ/QdY2V4TbjwF/H9INQAG05YbSMeJFQwydbLZbe27wkJ8McJjXb lOKvps7jGOwkG3bBkPmEqqbDCUNRY2wVO2Ns7NobLzO436aYkmnsaBUsr CSCs7zj+mtcBcm4B1ILkDh6SvGvyw1cFQLTh4f9Fd7UQqFbX5sRYdM3QJ 6NyV14vQm2+mLFfRlj0JWhHW6o5SQ0aMbxEeZRjEoTAoK4r2t8CCdBbUb W0cP59sQITN+jKOBRZXVGWr7D9ZdpMvHUZvDR8kYWgj2KyY+hKDy6h4BP w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yu9Af2fNSpWGZ+tggcNUvg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: E+dnm1NNTGiTbw9a/T27bA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11371"; a="60297604" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,242,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="60297604" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Mar 2025 11:32:56 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: uOVuXGMCS0e0ekUlEPgIbg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xqUpE2//RxCXnu1kR9bnlA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,242,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="120677188" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by orviesa010.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Mar 2025 11:32:54 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tsQst-00000001ws8-2jC3; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 20:32:51 +0200 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 20:32:51 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Raag Jadav Cc: lee@kernel.org, giometti@enneenne.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, raymond.tan@intel.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] gpio: elkhartlake: depend on MFD_INTEL_EHL_PSE_GPIO Message-ID: References: <20250307052231.551737-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20250307052231.551737-3-raag.jadav@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:03:01PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 01:00:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 08:37:26AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 10:52:28AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > > Now that we have Intel MFD driver for PSE GPIO, depend on it. > > > > > Andy, any guidance on GPIO? > > > > I'm not sure what we are waiting here from me. Hadn't I reviewed your GPIO > > part already? > > Ah, I added MFD dependency for leaf drivers after your v1 review. > So this one seems missing the tag. Can I add it? I see, but this can be added later on. And on the second thought, do we accept the configurations when user wants to have GPIO on EHL, and doesn't care about TIO? Maybe this patch is not needed after all? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko