From: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
To: Esteban Blanc <eblanc@baylibre.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
broonie@kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
jpanis@baylibre.com, jneanne@baylibre.com,
aseketeli@baylibre.com, sterzik@ti.com, u-kumar1@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] rtc: tps6594: Add driver for TPS6594 RTC
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 20:22:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZF514wvUt_xrU1gG@surfacebook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230512141755.1712358-2-eblanc@baylibre.com>
Fri, May 12, 2023 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Esteban Blanc kirjoitti:
> TPS6594 PMIC is a MFD. This patch adds support for
> the RTC found inside TPS6594 family of PMIC.
>
> Alarm is also supported.
...
> +/*
> + * Min and max values supported with 'offset' interface (swapped sign)
> + * After conversion, the values does not exceed the range [-32767, 33767] which COMP_REG must
> + * conform to
Please, format it better and do not forget to use proper punctuation (commas,
periods, etc.).
> + */
> +#define MIN_OFFSET (-277774)
> +#define MAX_OFFSET (277774)
...
> +/* Multiplier for ppb conversions */
> +#define PPB_MULT (1000000000LL)
We have something in units.h. Can you use generic macro?
...
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_RTC_INTERRUPTS,
> + TPS6594_BIT_IT_ALARM, val);
> +
> + return ret;
return regmap_update_bits(...);
...
> + /*
> + * Set GET_TIME to 0. This way, next time we set GET_TIME to 1 we are sure to store an
> + * up-to-date timestamp
> + */
Please, check all your multi-line comments for proper punctuation.
...
> + /* Check if RTC is running. */
Please, keep a single style for the one-line comments (with or without period
at the end).
> + alm->enabled = int_val & TPS6594_BIT_IT_ALARM ? 1 : 0;
Ternary is reduntand.
> + return ret;
Why not return 0 explicitly? Or do you return positive value?
...
> + comp_data[0] = (u16)value & 0xFF;
> + comp_data[1] = ((u16)value >> 8) & 0xFF;
Use proper bitwise type, i.e. __le16.
...
> + value = (u16)comp_data[0] | ((u16)comp_data[1] << 8);
Ditto.
...
> + /* Convert from RTC calibration register format to ppb format */
> + tmp = calibration * (s64)PPB_MULT;
Is casting really needed?
> + if (tmp < 0)
> + tmp -= TICKS_PER_HOUR / 2LL;
> + else
> + tmp += TICKS_PER_HOUR / 2LL;
Is it guaranteed to have no overflow here?
> + tmp = div_s64(tmp, TICKS_PER_HOUR);
> +
> + /*
> + * Offset value operates in negative way, so swap sign.
> + * See 8.3.10.5, (32768 - COMP_REG)
> + */
> + *offset = (long)-tmp;
> +
> + return ret;
ret?!
> +}
> +
> +static int tps6594_rtc_set_offset(struct device *dev, long offset)
> +{
> + int calibration;
> + s64 tmp;
Similar questions here as per above routine.
> + /* Make sure offset value is within supported range */
> + if (offset < MIN_OFFSET || offset > MAX_OFFSET)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + /* Convert from ppb format to RTC calibration register format */
> + tmp = offset * (s64)TICKS_PER_HOUR;
> + if (tmp < 0)
> + tmp -= PPB_MULT / 2LL;
> + else
> + tmp += PPB_MULT / 2LL;
> + tmp = div_s64(tmp, PPB_MULT);
> +
> + /* Offset value operates in negative way, so swap sign */
> + calibration = (int)-tmp;
> +
> + return tps6594_rtc_set_calibration(dev, calibration);
> +}
...
> +static int tps6594_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct tps6594 *tps;
> + struct rtc_device *rtc;
> + int irq;
> + int ret;
> + tps = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
Can be united with definition of tps above.
...
> + /* RTC not running */
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + /* Start rtc */
RTC for the sake of consistency.
But I think one of the comment is redundant.
...
> + mdelay(100);
Such long delays have to be explicitly elaborated (in the comment on top).
> + }
...
> + irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, TPS6594_IRQ_NAME_ALARM);
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get irq\n");
> + return irq;
return dev_err_probe(...);
> + }
...
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request_threaded_irq\n");
> + return ret;
Ditto.
...
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to init rtc as wakeup source\n");
> + return ret;
Ditto.
...
> +
Blank line is not needed.
> +module_platform_driver(tps6594_rtc_driver);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-12 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-12 14:17 [PATCH v4 0/3] TI TPS6594 PMIC support (RTC, pinctrl, regulators) Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 14:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] rtc: tps6594: Add driver for TPS6594 RTC Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 17:22 ` andy.shevchenko [this message]
2023-05-17 16:47 ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-17 16:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-22 11:49 ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 14:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] pinctrl: tps6594: Add driver for TPS6594 pinctrl and GPIOs Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 17:07 ` andy.shevchenko
2023-05-16 13:05 ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-16 16:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-17 9:58 ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-17 13:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-17 14:43 ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-17 15:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-22 8:45 ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-23 9:26 ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-23 11:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-23 11:32 ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 14:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Add driver for TI TPS6594 regulators Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 17:34 ` andy.shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZF514wvUt_xrU1gG@surfacebook \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=aseketeli@baylibre.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=eblanc@baylibre.com \
--cc=jneanne@baylibre.com \
--cc=jpanis@baylibre.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sterzik@ti.com \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).