linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
To: Esteban Blanc <eblanc@baylibre.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	broonie@kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it,
	alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	jpanis@baylibre.com, jneanne@baylibre.com,
	aseketeli@baylibre.com, sterzik@ti.com, u-kumar1@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] rtc: tps6594: Add driver for TPS6594 RTC
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 20:22:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZF514wvUt_xrU1gG@surfacebook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230512141755.1712358-2-eblanc@baylibre.com>

Fri, May 12, 2023 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Esteban Blanc kirjoitti:
> TPS6594 PMIC is a MFD. This patch adds support for
> the RTC found inside TPS6594 family of PMIC.
> 
> Alarm is also supported.

...

> +/*
> + * Min and max values supported with 'offset' interface (swapped sign)
> + * After conversion, the values does not exceed the range [-32767, 33767] which COMP_REG must
> + * conform to

Please, format it better and do not forget to use proper punctuation (commas,
periods, etc.).

> + */
> +#define MIN_OFFSET (-277774)
> +#define MAX_OFFSET (277774)

...

> +/* Multiplier for ppb conversions */
> +#define PPB_MULT (1000000000LL)

We have something in units.h. Can you use generic macro?

...

> +	ret = regmap_update_bits(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_RTC_INTERRUPTS,
> +				 TPS6594_BIT_IT_ALARM, val);
> +
> +	return ret;

	return regmap_update_bits(...);

...

> +	/*
> +	 * Set GET_TIME to 0. This way, next time we set GET_TIME to 1 we are sure to store an
> +	 * up-to-date timestamp
> +	 */

Please, check all your multi-line comments for proper punctuation.

...

> +	/* Check if RTC is running. */

Please, keep a single style for the one-line comments (with or without period
at the end).

> +	alm->enabled = int_val & TPS6594_BIT_IT_ALARM ? 1 : 0;

Ternary is reduntand.

> +	return ret;

Why not return 0 explicitly? Or do you return positive value?

...

> +	comp_data[0] = (u16)value & 0xFF;
> +	comp_data[1] = ((u16)value >> 8) & 0xFF;

Use proper bitwise type, i.e. __le16.

...

> +	value = (u16)comp_data[0] | ((u16)comp_data[1] << 8);

Ditto.

...

> +	/* Convert from RTC calibration register format to ppb format */
> +	tmp = calibration * (s64)PPB_MULT;

Is casting really needed?

> +	if (tmp < 0)
> +		tmp -= TICKS_PER_HOUR / 2LL;
> +	else
> +		tmp += TICKS_PER_HOUR / 2LL;

Is it guaranteed to have no overflow here?

> +	tmp = div_s64(tmp, TICKS_PER_HOUR);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Offset value operates in negative way, so swap sign.
> +	 * See 8.3.10.5, (32768 - COMP_REG)
> +	 */
> +	*offset = (long)-tmp;
> +
> +	return ret;

ret?!

> +}
> +
> +static int tps6594_rtc_set_offset(struct device *dev, long offset)
> +{
> +	int calibration;
> +	s64 tmp;

Similar questions here as per above routine.

> +	/* Make sure offset value is within supported range */
> +	if (offset < MIN_OFFSET || offset > MAX_OFFSET)
> +		return -ERANGE;
> +
> +	/* Convert from ppb format to RTC calibration register format */
> +	tmp = offset * (s64)TICKS_PER_HOUR;
> +	if (tmp < 0)
> +		tmp -= PPB_MULT / 2LL;
> +	else
> +		tmp += PPB_MULT / 2LL;
> +	tmp = div_s64(tmp, PPB_MULT);
> +
> +	/* Offset value operates in negative way, so swap sign */
> +	calibration = (int)-tmp;
> +
> +	return tps6594_rtc_set_calibration(dev, calibration);
> +}

...

> +static int tps6594_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct tps6594 *tps;
> +	struct rtc_device *rtc;
> +	int irq;
> +	int ret;

> +	tps = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);

Can be united with definition of tps above.

...

> +	/* RTC not running */
> +	if (ret == 0) {
> +		/* Start rtc */

RTC for the sake of consistency.

But I think one of the comment is redundant.

...

> +		mdelay(100);

Such long delays have to be explicitly elaborated (in the comment on top).

> +	}

...

> +	irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, TPS6594_IRQ_NAME_ALARM);
> +	if (irq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get irq\n");
> +		return irq;

	return dev_err_probe(...);

> +	}

...

> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request_threaded_irq\n");
> +		return ret;

Ditto.

...

> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to init rtc as wakeup source\n");
> +		return ret;

Ditto.

...

> +

Blank line is not needed.

> +module_platform_driver(tps6594_rtc_driver);

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-12 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-12 14:17 [PATCH v4 0/3] TI TPS6594 PMIC support (RTC, pinctrl, regulators) Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 14:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] rtc: tps6594: Add driver for TPS6594 RTC Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 17:22   ` andy.shevchenko [this message]
2023-05-17 16:47     ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-17 16:52       ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-22 11:49         ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 14:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] pinctrl: tps6594: Add driver for TPS6594 pinctrl and GPIOs Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 17:07   ` andy.shevchenko
2023-05-16 13:05     ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-16 16:48       ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-17  9:58         ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-17 13:51           ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-17 14:43             ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-17 15:04               ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-22  8:45                 ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-23  9:26                 ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-23 11:03                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-23 11:32                     ` Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 14:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Add driver for TI TPS6594 regulators Esteban Blanc
2023-05-12 17:34   ` andy.shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZF514wvUt_xrU1gG@surfacebook \
    --to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=aseketeli@baylibre.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=eblanc@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jneanne@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jpanis@baylibre.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sterzik@ti.com \
    --cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).