From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Subject: Re: [libgpiod] Python bindings don't allow to wait on events indefinitely
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 13:17:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGcGZwwRiy2jFfR0@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3545766.4eto28bQOc@archbook>
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:28:34PM +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in libgpiod 1.6.x, Line.event_wait's codepath had no path where ts
> as passed to ppoll could ever be NULL. This means waiting indefinitely
> was impossible.
>
> I thought hey, maybe the new Python bindings in libgpiod 2.x fixed this,
> but no, it has made it worse by explicitly setting timeout to 0 seconds
> if it's None[1]. Obviously, this behaviour can't be changed now, because
> people depend on this API to return immediately now with None as the
> parameter, and changing it to wait indefinitely would no doubt break
> actual programs.
>
> So I'm left wondering if there's a particular reason users of these
> bindings shouldn't wait on events indefinitely or if that same mistake
> was just made twice in a row.
>
> Is there some way the API could be enhanced to support waiting for
> events indefinitely without having to slap a While True with
> an arbitrarily high timeout around every single invocation?
>
That does sound like a bug to me, but the rest of your mail isn't worth
responding to.
A more productive approach could be to submit a patch that describes the
problem and suggests a fix, say:
def poll_fd(fd: int, timeout: Optional[Union[timedelta, float]] = None) -> bool:
- if timeout is None:
- timeout = 0.0
-
and see where that goes.
Cheers,
Kent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-19 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-11 20:28 [libgpiod] Python bindings don't allow to wait on events indefinitely Nicolas Frattaroli
2023-05-19 5:17 ` Kent Gibson [this message]
2023-05-19 14:32 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2023-05-19 14:56 ` Kent Gibson
2023-05-23 10:03 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-05-23 10:15 ` Kent Gibson
2023-05-23 12:31 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-05-23 13:20 ` Kent Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZGcGZwwRiy2jFfR0@sol \
--to=warthog618@gmail.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).