From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:59:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHjAVnDAM/YzZSem@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZHjAF6xg1fAaJhQV@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 06:58:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 05:07:39PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 05:51:10PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:11:26AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > This is a sloppy logic analyzer using GPIOs. It comes with a script to
> > > > isolate a CPU for polling. While this is definitely not a production
> > > > level analyzer, it can be a helpful first view when remote debugging.
> > > > Read the documentation for details.
> > >
> > > Good enough I think,
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Thanks, Andy!
> >
> > To GPIO maintainers: can we apply the "new-driver-rule" and still have
> > it in 5.19? There can't be any regression and it has all comments
> > addressed. Also, I am talking about this project at Kernel Recipes late
> > next week and it would be great to say that it is finally merged :)
>
> Year passed. Any news here?
Ah, GPIO maintainers probably missed this since no Cc.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-29 9:11 [PATCH v8 0/1] gpio: add simple logic analyzer using polling Wolfram Sang
2022-03-29 9:11 ` [PATCH v8 1/1] gpio: add sloppy " Wolfram Sang
2022-03-30 14:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-05-25 15:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-06-01 15:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-01 15:59 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-06-05 6:31 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-06-01 21:39 ` andy.shevchenko
2023-06-02 6:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-02 6:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-02 14:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-02 7:40 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZHjAVnDAM/YzZSem@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).