Re: [PATCH v4] pinctrl: intel: refine ->irq_set_type() hook

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 01:35:19PM +0000, Jadav, Raag wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 06:20:22PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > Refine ->irq_set_type() hook and improve its readability by:
> > >
> > > - Reducing scope of spinlock by moving unneeded operations out of it.
> > > - Dropping redundant PADCFG0_RXEVCFG_SHIFT and including it directly
> > >   into PADCFG0_RXEVCFG_* definitions.
> > > - Utilizing temporary variables for common operations.
> > > - Simplifying if-else-if chain.
> > 
> > Two questions out of curiosity.
> > Do we gain or lose bytes with this?
> 
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 33/0 (33)
> Function                                     old     new   delta
> intel_gpio_irq_type                          317     350     +33
> Total: Before=10469, After=10502, chg +0.32%
> 
> > > +	value = readl(reg);
> > 
> > > +	value = (value & ~PADCFG0_RXINV) | rxinv;
> > > +	value = (value & ~PADCFG0_RXEVCFG_MASK) | rxevcfg;
> > 
> > Same question if we change this to be similar to the current code, i.e.
> > 
> > 	value = readl(reg);
> > 
> > 	value &= ~(PADCFG0_RXEVCFG_MASK | PADCFG0_RXINV);
> > 	value |= rxevcfg;
> > 	value |= rxinv;
> > 
> > And I would keep blank lines after readl() and before writel() since we have
> > more than a single line in between.
> 
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-9 (-9)
> Function                                     old     new   delta
> intel_gpio_irq_type                          317     308      -9
> Total: Before=10469, After=10460, chg -0.09%

Do I understand correctly that this is your patch + suggested above?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko