From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47E0EB64D7 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 10:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231393AbjF3Ku0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2023 06:50:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43376 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230054AbjF3KuZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2023 06:50:25 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2D5B2D56 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 03:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-553a1f13d9fso1317148a12.1 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 03:50:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1688122223; x=1690714223; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cS+hqd1xvKBcodweRc6YKARzfK3Qs34YIhhZpZOLMS8=; b=GvXdfkFFd8O/c3fnk0cfUzNr+5JaI1s117mGj8X5qOMVBzUuPo2DHVuF/AMLPXTUQP 2/AvmehaflOippLMWXrMhODdfsJ8AERRDKmloqDBbXVTVJw2EuOZdu1cW5qiGa8AvlzD 1BsVeLIChSWqeTjvzjTnWzvdvAY+hBnuzenhjJg9xBRFPjDtN0V0A6SunMD2JSwtH4QQ tBJESvy2ucWzJu3koUVkxIRhmEVzoi3dNxWYAE9D/U638UfT5fDvt9tfIEnXAdUyc2Ql MjmHNjoUN+aRUol8CTcPQxI47f5A00bT99WRC+0W+ZJZG/tonkVUj2QBnpe/Jhh9OkiC NjbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688122223; x=1690714223; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cS+hqd1xvKBcodweRc6YKARzfK3Qs34YIhhZpZOLMS8=; b=CyK/fbitAGFwpnn1H7DHBCtcUQD8Gl0ue42kWZ0plqGb59X9cmOvftiLYOjeDJmEzd ZhYI8sxUBqqhjTfSh3VHfi7A+rJ/rXuE7RG2cJYXpwKXZMRHxBaXlg7BxIBM0pGHiGFe LoObH4pTKCOUi27TVtGXzI6i5ThwWgwRjc1ATnxMjbK4hDJAfuwaOtQqhyxZZqJyiSZ/ 4PfV44n4iwSNbJwP7+bL7Duaw/+yJlLmUg1W6InsUTit6wn7usO8HGjJWlHK3d5DJYZ7 9acps5phPypkwm2gQEhJcZTjhS3ABT0Kg5OSvYpfqU3bhW/JlyTJTBtiJjUW8dccAov9 fxOw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZZrFFzpOwuyVlFFmCS8UKqwuVyvqyEZmZRpHqNrE88m/HOefbX yu9WYpEzr+6Z5MYKARRbdX0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlHIynlqELUoDUcwqlBFTEIrUkQbin/8Lpjmq9yN4QdYG9Gm4hBGswMzBYjoKj6+xuZIWrctjA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:42a6:b0:125:29e5:ae53 with SMTP id o38-20020a056a2042a600b0012529e5ae53mr2519594pzj.62.1688122223053; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 03:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sol (194-223-178-180.tpgi.com.au. [194.223.178.180]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z6-20020aa785c6000000b00663b712bfbdsm9319999pfn.57.2023.06.30.03.50.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Jun 2023 03:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:50:18 +0800 From: Kent Gibson To: Erik Schilling Cc: Linux-GPIO , Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH libgpiod 4/4] bindings: rust: clippy: silence false-positive on iterator Message-ID: References: <20230629-clippy-v1-0-9ff088713c54@linaro.org> <20230629-clippy-v1-4-9ff088713c54@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:46:11PM +0200, Erik Schilling wrote: > On Fri Jun 30, 2023 at 12:19 PM CEST, Kent Gibson wrote: > > > > > > > That is the only test failing out of the whole suite, so gpiosim is not > > the problem. > > > > That is with the latest from the Raspberry Pi rpi-6.4.y branch[1] > > (a867309b7a55 so a few days old now), with CONFIG_GPIO_SIM so that I can > > run the tests. > > Happens to be running on a Pi ZeroW, but I don't think that test is speed > > sensitive. I have done a complete rebuild - same result. > > > > Are there any distos enabling GPIO_SIM yet? > > Fedora does now (after I asked for it [2]). But it does not support any > 32-bit ARM targets anymore :/. Can you try reproducing it without the > patches? I would be surprised if this was related to the patches. > Tried that - same result with libgpiod master. So it is not from your patches. Cheers. Kent. > I will rebuild my armv7hf VM soon and retry with a self-built kernel. > but not sure when I will get around that. > > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215980 > > - Erik