From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Erik Schilling <erik.schilling@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, brgl@bgdev.pl, viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [libgpiod][PATCH] bindings: rust: fix clippy lint warnings
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 15:57:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZJAKTdRVEwZfnKb+@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CTGGDNWWBD6E.FLAMJGXFKF3S@fedora>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 09:36:48AM +0200, Erik Schilling wrote:
> Sorry, got distracted while sorting out the MSRV mess that I sent a
> separate patch for [4].
>
> I do not think that this is the reason why we need the casts...
> bindgen generates bindings using std::os::raw::c_uint [5] which is
> stable since 1.1.0 (and was previously defined as u32 [6]). I think we
> can just drop the casts entirely? I can run cargo clippy --fix on latest
> stable (1.70.0), then go back to 1.60 and everything is still building.
> I am having trouble to execute the tests in that version due to some
> linkage errors, but that should not be the fault of the casts.
>
> Did I got this correct or am I misunderstanding your reasoning?
>
My reasoning was simply that building the bindings as you suggested
resulted in lint warnings, which is noisy and iritating when trying to
lint my own code. And I assumed that changing the code or limiting the
rust version was not an option.
But I'm just the messenger. Your question would be better directed at
Viresh - it is his code so he should be able to tell you why the casts
are there.
IIRC we needed the casts historically, though I don't recall the rust
version we were using at the time.
If we've moved beyond that then I have no problem with the casts being
removedi, in fact in my initial comment I lamented the fact they were
necessary.
> Note: One needs to fix a bug that cargo clippy --fix introduces since
> it replaces nth(0) with next() in event_buffers.rs and introduces a
> unconditional recursion.
>
Who is using --fix??
I did put an allow in there for that one, with a comment about the
recursion, though I'm not sure the comment is sufficiently clear without
the warning in front of you - and you no longer get that with the allow
in place.
Cheers,
Kent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-19 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-12 15:40 [libgpiod][PATCH] bindings: rust: fix clippy lint warnings Kent Gibson
2023-06-14 8:14 ` Erik Schilling
2023-06-14 8:29 ` Kent Gibson
2023-06-14 8:40 ` Erik Schilling
2023-06-14 9:06 ` Kent Gibson
2023-06-14 9:16 ` Erik Schilling
2023-06-19 7:36 ` Erik Schilling
2023-06-19 7:49 ` Erik Schilling
2023-06-19 7:57 ` Kent Gibson [this message]
2023-06-19 8:13 ` Erik Schilling
2023-06-19 8:33 ` Kent Gibson
2023-06-19 8:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-06-19 8:59 ` Erik Schilling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZJAKTdRVEwZfnKb+@sol \
--to=warthog618@gmail.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=erik.schilling@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).