* [PATCH for-next v1 1/3] pinctrl: baytrail: reduce scope of spinlock in ->dbg_show() hook
2023-06-16 20:33 [PATCH for-next v1 0/3] Minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl Raag Jadav
@ 2023-06-16 20:33 ` Raag Jadav
2023-06-16 20:33 ` [PATCH for-next v1 2/3] pinctrl: baytrail: add warning for BYT_VAL_REG retrieval failure Raag Jadav
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Raag Jadav @ 2023-06-16 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linus.walleij, mika.westerberg, andriy.shevchenko
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, mallikarjunappa.sangannavar, pandith.n,
Raag Jadav
Reduce scope of spinlock to IO operations in ->dbg_show() hook
and save a few bytes.
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-12 (-12)
Function old new delta
byt_gpio_dbg_show 890 878 -12
Total: Before=17029, After=17017, chg -0.07%
Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
index d53952f5c87c..54d3c5c26944 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
@@ -1241,30 +1241,30 @@ static void byt_gpio_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip)
for (i = 0; i < vg->soc->npins; i++) {
const struct intel_community *comm;
+ void __iomem *conf_reg, *val_reg;
const char *pull_str = NULL;
const char *pull = NULL;
- void __iomem *reg;
unsigned long flags;
const char *label;
unsigned int pin;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&byt_lock, flags);
pin = vg->soc->pins[i].number;
- reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, pin, BYT_CONF0_REG);
- if (!reg) {
+
+ conf_reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, pin, BYT_CONF0_REG);
+ if (!conf_reg) {
seq_printf(s, "Pin %i: can't retrieve CONF0\n", pin);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&byt_lock, flags);
continue;
}
- conf0 = readl(reg);
- reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, pin, BYT_VAL_REG);
- if (!reg) {
+ val_reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, pin, BYT_VAL_REG);
+ if (!val_reg) {
seq_printf(s, "Pin %i: can't retrieve VAL\n", pin);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&byt_lock, flags);
continue;
}
- val = readl(reg);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&byt_lock, flags);
+ conf0 = readl(conf_reg);
+ val = readl(val_reg);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&byt_lock, flags);
comm = byt_get_community(vg, pin);
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH for-next v1 2/3] pinctrl: baytrail: add warning for BYT_VAL_REG retrieval failure
2023-06-16 20:33 [PATCH for-next v1 0/3] Minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl Raag Jadav
2023-06-16 20:33 ` [PATCH for-next v1 1/3] pinctrl: baytrail: reduce scope of spinlock in ->dbg_show() hook Raag Jadav
@ 2023-06-16 20:33 ` Raag Jadav
2023-06-16 20:33 ` [PATCH for-next v1 3/3] pinctrl: baytrail: invert if condition Raag Jadav
2023-06-19 6:22 ` [PATCH for-next v1 0/3] Minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl Mika Westerberg
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Raag Jadav @ 2023-06-16 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linus.walleij, mika.westerberg, andriy.shevchenko
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, mallikarjunappa.sangannavar, pandith.n,
Raag Jadav
Add warning for BYT_VAL_REG retrieval failure and continue such case
to avoid unintended reads/writes in pm_ops.
Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
index 54d3c5c26944..97ead2c58b66 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
@@ -1758,6 +1758,10 @@ static int byt_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
vg->context.pads[i].conf0 = value;
reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, pin, BYT_VAL_REG);
+ if (!reg) {
+ dev_warn(vg->dev, "Pin %i: can't retrieve VAL\n", i);
+ continue;
+ }
value = readl(reg) & BYT_VAL_RESTORE_MASK;
vg->context.pads[i].val = value;
}
@@ -1794,6 +1798,10 @@ static int byt_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
}
reg = byt_gpio_reg(vg, pin, BYT_VAL_REG);
+ if (!reg) {
+ dev_warn(vg->dev, "Pin %i: can't retrieve VAL\n", i);
+ continue;
+ }
value = readl(reg);
if ((value & BYT_VAL_RESTORE_MASK) !=
vg->context.pads[i].val) {
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH for-next v1 3/3] pinctrl: baytrail: invert if condition
2023-06-16 20:33 [PATCH for-next v1 0/3] Minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl Raag Jadav
2023-06-16 20:33 ` [PATCH for-next v1 1/3] pinctrl: baytrail: reduce scope of spinlock in ->dbg_show() hook Raag Jadav
2023-06-16 20:33 ` [PATCH for-next v1 2/3] pinctrl: baytrail: add warning for BYT_VAL_REG retrieval failure Raag Jadav
@ 2023-06-16 20:33 ` Raag Jadav
2023-06-19 6:22 ` [PATCH for-next v1 0/3] Minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl Mika Westerberg
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Raag Jadav @ 2023-06-16 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linus.walleij, mika.westerberg, andriy.shevchenko
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, mallikarjunappa.sangannavar, pandith.n,
Raag Jadav
Invert if condition and get rid of redundant else.
Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
index 97ead2c58b66..27aef62fc7c0 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
@@ -753,9 +753,7 @@ static void byt_gpio_clear_triggering(struct intel_pinctrl *vg, unsigned int off
value = readl(reg);
/* Do not clear direct-irq enabled IRQs (from gpio_disable_free) */
- if (value & BYT_DIRECT_IRQ_EN)
- /* nothing to do */ ;
- else
+ if (!(value & BYT_DIRECT_IRQ_EN))
value &= ~(BYT_TRIG_POS | BYT_TRIG_NEG | BYT_TRIG_LVL);
writel(value, reg);
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-next v1 0/3] Minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl
2023-06-16 20:33 [PATCH for-next v1 0/3] Minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl Raag Jadav
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-06-16 20:33 ` [PATCH for-next v1 3/3] pinctrl: baytrail: invert if condition Raag Jadav
@ 2023-06-19 6:22 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-06-19 10:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mika Westerberg @ 2023-06-19 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Raag Jadav
Cc: linus.walleij, andriy.shevchenko, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
mallikarjunappa.sangannavar, pandith.n
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 02:03:53AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> This series implements minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl driver.
>
> Raag Jadav (3):
> pinctrl: baytrail: reduce scope of spinlock in ->dbg_show() hook
> pinctrl: baytrail: add warning for BYT_VAL_REG retrieval failure
> pinctrl: baytrail: invert if condition
For the series,
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-next v1 0/3] Minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl
2023-06-19 6:22 ` [PATCH for-next v1 0/3] Minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl Mika Westerberg
@ 2023-06-19 10:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2023-06-19 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mika Westerberg
Cc: Raag Jadav, linus.walleij, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
mallikarjunappa.sangannavar, pandith.n
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 09:22:47AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 02:03:53AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > This series implements minor improvements for Baytrail pinctrl driver.
> >
> > Raag Jadav (3):
> > pinctrl: baytrail: reduce scope of spinlock in ->dbg_show() hook
> > pinctrl: baytrail: add warning for BYT_VAL_REG retrieval failure
> > pinctrl: baytrail: invert if condition
>
> For the series,
>
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread