From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20B5410F6; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:05:29 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10923"; a="379968534" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,273,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="379968534" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Dec 2023 07:05:28 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10922"; a="947207377" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,273,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="947207377" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Dec 2023 07:05:26 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rDQnc-00000005YR1-0fDw; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:05:24 +0200 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:05:23 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Kent Gibson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, brgl@bgdev.pl, linus.walleij@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gpiolib: cdev: reduce locking in gpio_desc_to_lineinfo() Message-ID: References: <20231212054253.50094-1-warthog618@gmail.com> <20231212054253.50094-4-warthog618@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:07:28PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 03:56:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 01:42:52PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: ... > > > - unsigned long flags; > > > + unsigned long iflags, dflags; > > > > With a preliminary conversion to cleanup.h this whole change becomes cleaner, > > no? > > You mean the scoped guards? Dunno - haven't used them. > Care to provide more detail? Yes. With use of those the flags will gone and you won't need iflags, which is non-standard name for the spin lock flags variable anyway, at all. Only new dflags will come here. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko