From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com (mail-pg1-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ED1E2031B; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gYm1uYro" Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5cdf76cde78so254814a12.1; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:15:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703254505; x=1703859305; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zSMHDuQX1y5+DYhjAAy/0kV003znPZue6vWKu4XMzcM=; b=gYm1uYroCKmxmSJzdloQ7lUn/STP99g9cZKDBszIggG/qVCmPVU679AJguP8NStMpi OhiXwXLATrHmIDTDEKYoY/uC0HjvdhB/jYwuRmdAYjy4WgEzsCcuF23+k0jZv6Sj9IyA JfTuQFwHtl5miFJt+VWDLZb6RGV2RrLKDeoJvUBSuUqQLJsbAAgpEo33UomrS155EDHW NlB1qdemmSdXNhYDU3xAcQYaAB30DI66UEGtkC4T+FBrUpa8nLZU/Vk5/yXQUwSCbCQ6 3jZ7JfuvyihevaF6742I0zpPE/ggD3lI4xVBqdHomM16f27dxBf2xURsvcWOSxx1tXoB RPiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703254505; x=1703859305; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zSMHDuQX1y5+DYhjAAy/0kV003znPZue6vWKu4XMzcM=; b=LcpewFvmnMHkKrX8KGsFikOGGovgPto67UYd+qUJRQnWf/4f3kj+MQgGUO5XtUEk1M SJtfxm4gQLBj2UUjVngddG94VlstNs7Jr6fooDtdwrmvGrp8F0wfBPvuyUjPEoW1upOh /dJMRQ3RKIE9oISCrDOPsW7M8B36H/rnLuyTM/k4I9oPxv7mpu9D5lf/jRJDeTjmbrYl P3L77U1cYVS5YXLhfxHpxVC3f4JnhyoILj85a8a9szCNtoXBVacyDqhNoxXoLd2Ms7DV Y14H3jsV6Tei0AD03XAtfoV0KLWSK7cWI8O2skyA8drsbUHCutE8HKrWx2bTAq8x0xY5 V5NA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxJq8q/5i4kTl0UOTcZ79CZ7vCwdo54EoNhV2cjAohc3I/NEBc3 BGLQUqWmYV5sxaUDQNB15Yc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF925AGB69UOlptiaAH4z/poi0QYDbpNb9g0blYiQZ+nfY2PqOSUMGxBI7zS38w3vvvpKXXqw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:4905:b0:195:37be:952f with SMTP id ft5-20020a056a20490500b0019537be952fmr479040pzb.107.1703254504814; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:15:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rigel (60-241-235-125.tpgi.com.au. [60.241.235.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o18-20020a170902d4d200b001d3ef3eb988sm1667855plg.253.2023.12.22.06.15.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:15:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:14:59 +0800 From: Kent Gibson To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Andy Shevchenko , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: cdev: Split line_get_debounce_period() and use Message-ID: References: <20231221175527.2814506-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 03:09:54PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 15:08, Kent Gibson wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 02:37:43PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:56 PM Kent Gibson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > And you could've included me in the Cc so I didn't just find it by > > > > > > accident. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe it's time to add you to the MAINTAINERS for this file as a designated > > > > > reviewer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are patching my recent change that you yourself reviewed only days > > > > ago. I would think that you would Cc me whether I were a maintainer or > > > > not as I'm very likely to have relevant feedback. > > > > > > On that note: do you see yourself as a full GPIO reviewer or do you > > > prefer I split out the uAPI part into a separate section in > > > MAINTAINERS and nominate you as its maintainer? > > > > > > > Not sure I'm comfortable with either. > > > > Definitely not full GPIO. I don't feel sufficiently familiar with GPIO > > and the related subsystems to qualify. > > > > Splitting out cdev and the uAPI makes more sense to me, but in my mind at > > least even that requires a level of commitment higher than the rather > > spotty attention I've been providing recently. > > I'm more inclined to leave it as is. > > > > I can still split the uAPI files into their own section, make Linus > and myself maintainers and make you a reviewer, how about that? > That is closer to the reality, so that would work for me. Cheers, Kent.