From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8393C7E779; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 14:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707317288; cv=none; b=F1mJC55lSz87/XCbanjoWnRADpJBr3TVyFfGnE04XfYJBWtLUDtJb1ZcDLDLDBGkSRuZCrfv9CxiOQArc6LlW0epoVDHutRTJGenGYuRBKgLC+lPGJQ0TeOo1mCn9G1k+rr/PTdS8Hx7YvgM983KF2ssKBhBiX+YlZjDPVFQthI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707317288; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BKNP9vGvcUxiD10sWfb8N0pUD3IrC1mjd7jdcTMxLa4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NzxobUq3KS5Xu120snk7rtrWtqk6YGVOtADK8ouYV5gH2LAVraQuUc0Fr/be94nqaxaqEylh4A4Id9No6DHmr5SPGh5+DugsGox9LHwvSXb1lHTXqbmDLfMn710wGFICXpxM9SwMOcyDkuNF5P3HwMZgzNnTa4voZnxHiEDsYuI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=G50tUKri; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="G50tUKri" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707317286; x=1738853286; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=BKNP9vGvcUxiD10sWfb8N0pUD3IrC1mjd7jdcTMxLa4=; b=G50tUKriOwNdRmLd/8jdyVh4QwAKSwosyepf+tt3mGA2SlgmmTBA3NPs RP50j7wHk6noVzU6oTj1+fvc1txCvAJttzgNlv9/k00xukVY2JGnpiK8g t4b0qToSCnvdGR0hHySIKZXyF+H2Ew8WqwSQtGGFSCQc38TssNg8Vw+Zt JlS1eZXvaLJdbOoX8F+wYsHuV4k1g/hZNrmHMz3xl52E/ReZWhYfRzmlu yJRuhoc8+oSol9avcvWjz/vhf4n3x9XTi4hmB/m1QpoiQoj2e9aI9aFNN jngPH6A7v9f480kemwK6SCNtIh7Z8MZs/xMMsWqXA2CqlNZNpduJNVvje w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10976"; a="4866615" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,251,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="4866615" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Feb 2024 06:48:06 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10976"; a="910010162" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,251,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="910010162" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Feb 2024 06:48:03 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rXjDU-00000002dFR-1LRq; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 16:48:00 +0200 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 16:48:00 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Arturas Moskvinas Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com, akaessens@gmail.com, thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk, preid@electromag.com.au, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: mcp23s08: Check only GPIOs which have interrupts enabled Message-ID: References: <0dab8d77-ea4e-4cea-99dd-2ffe7c9051d5@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0dab8d77-ea4e-4cea-99dd-2ffe7c9051d5@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 12:50:51PM +0200, Arturas Moskvinas wrote: > On 2/5/24 15:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Do you want that information to be added as part of commit message or > > > information in the mailing thread will be enough? > > Up to maintainers. I'm fine with this email. If Linus uses b4 to generate > > a Link tag to this discussion it will be enough (in my opinion). > > Is there anything left for me to update/change? Or we're waiting for other > reviewers and/or Linus to chime in? I believe we are waiting for Linus' decision. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko