From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44EC1CD2A; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 19:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710702519; cv=none; b=W2MnReT3sw79LePb/uk7XNxZadpYet4pkEvSN6AAI4X54xdYlQAQyJNJLD1gwFJSfXvPNuL0RawxS8OJv+CfTNmWni5Yhu5TMwAbK9tSfYonjsKNLU27zfGSvz2OljkfMeircl3LyT05W3VcKEAqsnXvkeHt+PBbCV/LgfVnvA4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710702519; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zaERisymV1niG4vxlRgldFGNfFyMp3ln6L34ffmt14Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Q3i6gUa4MH9maPXVZ79po04qI00S85xmzkwIWXPaK6t2krkbLUL34IRGDj4rMlhjEco/diiFZM2ohVWOjA3wZ9a8c3SDDYPk3VYhUhTZY2D6CqmagfpWAkitfgDJD3VwoIDpDCHS19Srxa9KUgJa3F3cJWZumDS/OLjyMT16p7E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1758012FC; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC3013F23F; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 19:08:25 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Peng Fan , "Peng Fan (OSS)" , Sudeep Holla , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Oleksii Moisieiev , Linus Walleij , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , dl-linux-imx , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , AKASHI Takahiro , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support Message-ID: References: <20240314-pinctrl-scmi-v5-0-b19576e557f2@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 09:20:02PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 04:53:10PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:31:51AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > (and whatever you use to test on the backend server too, if you want > > to test this...) > > > > What are people using to test this, btw? Hi Dan, I think NXP has their own SCMI server embedded in TF-A (Peng posted a link at the public repo a while ago I think...) supporting Pinctrl; additionally Oleksii/EPAM (the original author of this series) have their own distinct proprietary SCMI server implementation with Pinctrl (not sure where it run from in this case but it is a Xen based setup if I remember right..). Beside these, there are at least a couple more Vendor proprietary incarnations of SCMI servers that I am aware of (that most probably did not support Pinctrl anyway as of now...) On top of this, on the other side there is, of course, the official SCP/SCMI server reference implementation, that can live in a number of different places thanks to the the virtualized environment built by Linaro, but this latter SCP/SCMI server does not have any official Pinctrl support either as of now. Thanks, Cristian