From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<imx@lists.linux.dev>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
andi.shyti@kernel.org, linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: pca953x: Probing too early
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 23:22:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsUXEkc5A5IBLpJv@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3c5d73f-a756-4f35-97f1-9301529cce34@lunn.ch>
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 11:29:07PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 05:47:27PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Adding the i2c-folks on Cc.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 5:02 PM Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am seeing an issue with the PCA935X driver in 6.6.41 and
> > > 6.11.0-rc4-next-20240820.
> > >
> > > The pca953x is getting probed before its I2C parent (i2c-2):
> > >
> > > [ 1.872917] pca953x 2-0020: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator
> > > [ 1.889195] pca953x 2-0020: using no AI
> > > [ 1.893260] pca953x 2-0020: failed writing register
> > > [ 1.898258] pca953x 2-0020: probe with driver pca953x failed with error -11
>
> -11 is EAGAIN, which is a bit odd. Given your description, i would of
> expected ENODEV. My guess is, it needs another resource, a GPIO,
> regulator, or interrupt controller. That resources might not of probed
> yet. If that is true, you want the pca953x_probe() to return
> -EPROBE_DEFER. The driver core will then try the probe again sometime
> later, hopefully when all the needed resources are available.
>
> Track down where the EAGAIN is coming from.
This is where:
ret = regmap_bulk_write(chip->regmap, regaddr, value, NBANK(chip));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&chip->client->dev, "failed writing register\n");
printing the error code in error messages would really help debugging.
Sadly, people don't do this. I don't know why we don't bulk replace
all error messages with just "Error!\n" to make them even more cryptic
and undebuggable!
It's likely that EAGAIN is coming from this - the probe function calls
one of the init functions, and propagates the error up, and as that
message is being printed... Tracing down, the I2C transfer function
returns -EAGAIN if it fails the transfer, and __i2c_smbus_xfer() will
itself retry it a number of times before propagating that -EAGAIN up.
EAGAIN is supposed to only be generated on arbitration loss - I'm
guessing that the I2C bus is in some kind of locked state, meaning
that devices on this bus are not accessible. Maybe the I2C bus
pull-ups aren't powered? Maybe there's a bad device on the bus
pulling the bus down?
Someone mentioned i2c-imx, maybe try enabling debug in that driver
to see why it's failing to access the device?
--
*** please note that I probably will only be occasionally responsive
*** for an unknown period of time due to recent eye surgery making
*** reading quite difficult.
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-20 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-20 20:02 pca953x: Probing too early Fabio Estevam
2024-08-20 20:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-20 20:45 ` Frank Li
2024-08-20 20:50 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-08-20 21:04 ` Frank Li
2024-08-20 21:13 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-08-20 20:47 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-08-20 21:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-08-20 22:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-20 23:56 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-08-20 22:22 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-08-20 23:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-08-21 0:50 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-08-21 5:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-21 6:04 ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-08-21 10:55 ` Fabio Estevam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZsUXEkc5A5IBLpJv@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).