From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 123CE1991CB; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724693163; cv=none; b=TC2ArGlsEFU9rj/7OTfncM1jI+WfgUkQwB9q1cM1IvFeVQKEuX1Q5IrDintXMaJTMReaD6Z/EUGj/FArFOqGP8ezchZBcs5/Z+9NogOC8/p/NidU7yjPBf5sHTGsOyxWCBq47I4XNS9Awd0gq5enOi1sznBeI+4U3/TnEINrf1Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724693163; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JsDdnLS2fGsM8ZypPWIx1C5ELSLkeSsbtZWDRLnMpdI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=unCa1wRhCAfsyOFagOoyCpo/rMvD+lHolsk3+CRtFtqeVZ/HxJW8zz5cqJTkbxDSCgIekKynoC2p6iNp0/hBPqP7uMlTmf73+1N6HJvj5ETni3wiAEzyttU4W+c5OlCfgSROps5UBOKT7DiUUtNqWONLq/l7RJ6WR6/8c6TaDrg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: D/iLN+GGTSuOCkiplWKSRg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lB5PYgEKSfSoaSyZYaGW4w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11176"; a="33795718" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,178,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="33795718" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Aug 2024 10:26:01 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2/yfE6YpR8KiMBVoXqYIVQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dWEh/z8aSGSZrmH+mDcH4w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,178,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="93306656" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Aug 2024 10:26:00 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sidTZ-000000021Wl-1dhC; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:25:57 +0300 Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:25:57 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: kerneldoc fixes for excess members Message-ID: References: <20240826161850.74447-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240826161850.74447-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 06:18:50PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Drop kerneldoc descriptions of struct members which do not exist to fix > W=1 warnings: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c:101: warning: Excess struct member 'lock' description in 'pch_gpio' > drivers/gpio/gpio-syscon.c:46: warning: Excess struct member 'compatible' description in 'syscon_gpio_data' I prefer on per-driver basis, but since it's simple and I have nothing in my queue, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko # for gpio-pch in the assumption that Bart takes it directly. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko