From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2951219E964; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 12:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725279480; cv=none; b=aZ4iUHjv7qS18ercxWrm+wwLZ0fv0diF3sLxCiJsQstu3t+3hw4A0KpdkJKsB36iq0cj+gPhLQcLA2HupFgrGlkQJNIr6/8gpqK3XcX2zRsHVasXJQnJwJs11HdPYRpqyIL2vMPUCYuIyvgQzJsltQUPhvb+x1YFXlBexwBl2P8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725279480; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qMR/fHZgJhsVQn4PLvqH8jVJYm8UDjDbuJL+1oFzmsw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JsZUkErsGG4TdeeKkY30lTJlGNXnwTdG2jj8HEYncZfpwRcEKyIOy09e+QofHJeyrHa8bTqNSq+lVNgE82TxvOyWQRsjppEXWC8WrVZXprU+iSaQSDEHbZ1zUBx37FTvvCZm6p5UY3i+oaPiQR6hK8YwALYcO860jERIqv/czO4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kGT3RtWFSgqLrzkjY+kkTw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: st0h01ULScOrhmNate5lnw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11182"; a="23427795" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,195,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="23427795" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2024 05:17:58 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: h0XQ353rQEqE82BKLnKspg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: XYdj68w2SpW2/AIXK9L/0A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,195,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="64634153" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2024 05:17:57 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sl60I-00000004M5S-3N8w; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 15:17:54 +0300 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:17:54 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Linus Walleij , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: kerneldoc fixes for excess members Message-ID: References: <20240826161850.74447-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 02:10:37PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 02/09/2024 14:03, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 6:18 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski ... > > I have a different patch in my queue that addresses the syscon warning > > already. Can you resend just the pch part? > > Heh, you just picked up something which was sent week after mine. :/ Whatever you decided, guys, feel free to use my Rb tag for gpio-pch. Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko