From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
Liao Chen <liaochen4@huawei.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] pinctrl: bcm2835: don't -EINVAL on alternate funcs from get_direction()
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:16:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a94c375a-baf9-4530-8425-762dc9adf35e@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250219102750.38519-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
On 19.02.2025 11:27, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> Since commit 9d846b1aebbe ("gpiolib: check the return value of
> gpio_chip::get_direction()") we check the return value of the
> get_direction() callback as per its API contract. This driver returns
> -EINVAL if the pin in question is set to one of the alternative
> (non-GPIO) functions. This isn't really an error that should be
> communicated to GPIOLIB so default to returning the "safe" value of
> INPUT in this case. The GPIO subsystem does not have the notion of
> "unknown" direction.
>
> Fixes: 9d846b1aebbe ("gpiolib: check the return value of gpio_chip::get_direction()")
> Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z7VFB1nST6lbmBIo@finisterre.sirena.org.uk/
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Closes:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/dfe03f88-407e-4ef1-ad30-42db53bbd4e4@samsung.com/
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
> index cc1fe0555e19..eaeec096bc9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
> @@ -346,14 +346,14 @@ static int bcm2835_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offse
> struct bcm2835_pinctrl *pc = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> enum bcm2835_fsel fsel = bcm2835_pinctrl_fsel_get(pc, offset);
>
> - /* Alternative function doesn't clearly provide a direction */
> - if (fsel > BCM2835_FSEL_GPIO_OUT)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (fsel == BCM2835_FSEL_GPIO_OUT)
> + return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
>
> - if (fsel == BCM2835_FSEL_GPIO_IN)
> - return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN;
> -
> - return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
> + /*
> + * Alternative function doesn't clearly provide a direction. Default
> + * to INPUT.
> + */
> + return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN;
> }
>
> static void bcm2835_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-19 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250219102802eucas1p11a9de63da00a6c76eaa79155764131ea@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2025-02-19 10:27 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH] pinctrl: bcm2835: don't -EINVAL on alternate funcs from get_direction() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-19 11:16 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2025-02-19 14:27 ` Mark Brown
2025-02-19 14:29 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-27 22:53 ` Linus Walleij
2025-02-28 10:47 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-19 15:46 ` Stefan Wahren
2025-03-04 7:53 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a94c375a-baf9-4530-8425-762dc9adf35e@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=liaochen4@huawei.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox