From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEDAF230268 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 09:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747818233; cv=none; b=NVr3KsZKCbuXedq4sOCX7/u34jWr6ICYErAMJpZleHO2/WabWbVpvtDSgiQJ0+REjTUqFM1l/HpyP2hitvQaoZTjbRUVQiDcXeCSkeRppkKwZ25W5E44pIYHOQR5zRKbSK/BD+wB/6p7+a3a1JyWZ29ygyd223Gzc1XdhPBtTXI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747818233; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BlonuLn3K/huJJPUddG0kcFCaN8hGvkizURgcY6TFZI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gMTJoP3eOVdxzsylE4IRmyVt+iJ7iYVYJMDsiYPJ9UxbnGh8pG45h3kVgKvPxryvqabJa1pccr1m/gnfMAB3TPxhhcRc8LZ9UW/3GKvI+dStV6eZq82r8jGbIZHax0h12Ymiy2I1ojnRpSLUTLLRmdyH/7yDn+HIjhhmAmyxnYM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QvuB28B/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QvuB28B/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1747818232; x=1779354232; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=BlonuLn3K/huJJPUddG0kcFCaN8hGvkizURgcY6TFZI=; b=QvuB28B/agflLAtJ9paysM6xosXwEmxqOmXUvLJaNQSbLtnQulAMVAMW /16f2cJU5x1e995WlJvTbnJnbO2azgJtQ2LQ08QZGxdoiT8urGLN/eDmr MapC4CCNXCS2BP96aw5pTid7pBf+RRgVvKIgIs+Xw7Ge38P1QIC8hsHAL em+P2egNaPbwn6RzEGsRcVfJWtdpLuCEZ8G6MmW9gFPuw1y8sJUNQHn5N 1fVRcacOf8EmxCNFP+w2BGJUujm3OEhCYHC1Xh0s1hIuEXhq0nkehGwzB rzo1Apyn6xcLEIvgnnkKGAL5emJFzXV7bsGp5PI4dHfYfse0dvgEGnvnw A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gOwy4axJQSCTGEpRYdFqFQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: r22WJVMeTymub/fGnpO02g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11439"; a="49690276" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,303,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="49690276" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2025 02:03:51 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Tduyk/dvS0iPhCIzKbcvDg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9gQCukbdSxSMs1upzwO3PQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,303,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="170845458" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2025 02:03:50 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uHfMZ-00000003Z9A-3A3Q; Wed, 21 May 2025 12:03:47 +0300 Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 12:03:47 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Linux GPIO , Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] intel-gpio for 6.16-1 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 10:44:16AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 9:45 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: ... > > Bartosz Golaszewski (2): > > gpio: graniterapids: use new line value setter callbacks > > gpio: ich: use new line value setter callbacks > > These have been in my gpio/for-next branch for a long time and the > ones in your PR have different commit hashes. Please remove them. I > don't see any notification about you having picked those up neither in > my inbox. Really? I though I commented a few weeks ago that I prefer to take them when Stephen complained on dups. After that there were no dups noticed. Since you haven't answered to that email, I (rightfully) assumed you are okay with the proposed course of actions. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko