From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F6A25B695 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 10:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747822775; cv=none; b=RQPRJShNABrWNVaxwMkVM0AspbBr/o3Xgi3pjnny2G9jNxwk+Bae7/TECfmqnzqyD+muoaJGuuCvUIqB5j1Sk7DHphKBYMC5ZYZlw6czQT8qjAbMe/au9TEhtzqhL34RGMQ9WmYv/kju08XI9soulwD/ZmJ7P80TO2PoHS7Zz90= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747822775; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uLwna10GX7VtssLEB0pkIhAKMByA5j1CZ/wjZ8ozTaQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=B1vh9I8mUnstdgq9d2GfsZeBR6EkUMmzzFWfzFTIj1tovLbnaNl27GrDyVEPNS+aKK7/WlKJ3bAZ6t5t2ic1SBPBffj0sl09IZMTKp9HwtWUrlp7MHn13weYVJ94djpMlcu9llXhOh7jy4vK40hHMLOm8Q24vhXciSgnmyOnLgk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=IMS0uO99; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="IMS0uO99" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1747822774; x=1779358774; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=uLwna10GX7VtssLEB0pkIhAKMByA5j1CZ/wjZ8ozTaQ=; b=IMS0uO99pWyW6cKMz6p+gVvuNXllEpM6ArgufiEsQdt0ZRvCc3Zd6cVu ZwiD15G8SM/ZMMqNspoJuU8HlXOAwO13JYYnMciD+j2uc8JRrdmrB74PG uXDTogrtHTDmoysnXD1k1l+VwLhY432r+260liWTDpHc8l39HIprRM29H xa/kPGNPZ2JkFJQM5e6y8clJQY4t2fDucwguUVx5iQHYDwBf0RtFVG+G0 eJKNL/RNb0Ocar6VohxkyJ/hxMJDQoLEXORR6HljzmNmuys3dc6TNg6c5 FSRBKMuWUjPrdPpaKLtmzdoZZB3e1DPvLPVZTeDJdjtiFGNmLXtUatPGm Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 45G6b/dDTFq7FmICy1O0Ng== X-CSE-MsgGUID: s/ZHL5NsTvq3tpfiria/Iw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11439"; a="49853067" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,303,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="49853067" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2025 03:19:33 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZMOrAsA3SESWmoFylbcs3w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LUmrkcDGSvGsODDg612taA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,303,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="140423075" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2025 03:19:32 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uHgXp-00000003aJv-1cTD; Wed, 21 May 2025 13:19:29 +0300 Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 13:19:29 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Linux GPIO , Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] intel-gpio for 6.16-1 (take 2) Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 12:04:59PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:42 AM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers, > > > > The GPIO ACPI code rework is in this PR. The patches are in Linux Next > > for at least a few days. However, one regression was reported and fixed > > immediately, which becomes the last patch in the PR. It wasn't in Linux Next > > since there was no Linux Next on this week. Nonetheless, Randy Dunlap tested > > it independently, that's why I include it into PR (without this the checkpatch > > and make htmldocs warn). > > > > Please, pull for v6.16-rc1. > > Pulled, thanks! Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko