linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: add missing mutex_destroy()
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 18:58:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCdutI4J6r5kjCNs@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Mf=xW6HFVYOOVS2W6GOGHS2tCRtDYAco0rz4wmEpMZhmA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:32:54PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 1:42 PM Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 12:40:23PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > We initialize the data->mutex in gpiod_export() but lack the
> > > corresponding mutex_destroy() in gpiod_unexport() causing a resource
> > > leak with mutex debugging enabled. Add the call right before kfreeing
> > > the GPIO data.
> >
> > No, there's no resource leak and it's perfectly fine not to call
> > mutex_destroy().
> 
> No, there's no leak but with lock debugging it still warns if the
> mutex is locked when it's being destroyed so the change still makes
> sense with a modified commit message.
> 
> > You can't just make shit up and then pretend to fix it...
> 
> There's no need for this kind of comment. You made your point clear in
> the first sentence.

Your claim that there's "a resource leak with mutex debugging enabled"
is is quite specific. Now I had to go check that no one had changed
something in ways they shouldn't have recently. But mutex_destroy()
still works as it always has, which you should have verified yourself
before sending a "fix" tagged for stable backport based on a hunch.

Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-16 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-16 10:40 [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: add missing mutex_destroy() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-05-16 11:42 ` Johan Hovold
2025-05-16 12:32   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-05-16 16:58     ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-05-19 12:18       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-05-19 12:42         ` Johan Hovold
2025-05-19 12:50           ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aCdutI4J6r5kjCNs@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).