From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F3727702B for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749638696; cv=none; b=n6sGYYdGUTRR556PmcVuByLgGwE+t3qsoSKz7494qiHhMAEoe1ePbRf/Cq7H9LmV5+scOyniweVKxXI45uL9XlDYUEocewwIgNk8NRhIB8qRHKLlo+R2huQNvvhY3LEnSUI98EiwtsB/K/IaEupWaoypC1eRsuscfxNpKHtH+Wc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749638696; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AkmlIkiSTFxMXdM17LcikxgoK7JYJCTqbrGwWgMtQVk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=G8gjsUYxAIlz9/2YsbP251XMZXyIAaZxazyp8b14kf7uUSKyHAVnqBs2bCXZKYe393AV9fu9h/JESLQEeKLpPpEvOfBK6zvh1xta2UjqEeMG5imgQW8c96uteYTdYEddEjXUq2qRzhkDJhQKMwFdjHTzBU5KUJVhI+ZWZ3Wa3/E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=TyRMti4M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="TyRMti4M" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=Akml IkiSTFxMXdM17LcikxgoK7JYJCTqbrGwWgMtQVk=; b=TyRMti4MuR4qhkjd7UZW 0DENHjUkcHAvMqIM6FyUllfddgTgEfm+wEeqGnS8gjkHQmfLNSSXzrx4lcE7BLs2 Wnr/TWU5JTEWO+H1FmwlzRwhh/NLqpTabhjBrCxgZ1NHKq/ASc8GDCIDiHnL99Wm 8E/7WspgEQimgg+V6fFjh9xYGPsjyrkGPQnOESQz/3UijWWwQFEITFZO8nbQvKLV SwezLdFuWudN4OO2noZFlGKHlfh47G17sSSfgmPukMra3GVmCE2Zt9mGdlENHaMc wwxz0VBVbMBu+2kvwln2AbCcy6qYxLCBYlNVseUDQo2GpUFR1ilGRRkIrpT7cGVO kQ== Received: (qmail 3208528 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2025 12:44:52 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 11 Jun 2025 12:44:52 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@6FW+gEk3go4ujnuC Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 12:44:52 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linus Walleij , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: renesas: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Bartosz Golaszewski , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linus Walleij , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski References: <20250611-gpiochip-set-rv-pinctrl-renesas-v1-0-ad169a794ef0@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="m9HLKi0jyL6BPHJD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250611-gpiochip-set-rv-pinctrl-renesas-v1-0-ad169a794ef0@linaro.org> --m9HLKi0jyL6BPHJD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 09:27:51AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Commit 98ce1eb1fd87e ("gpiolib: introduce gpio_chip setters that return > values") added new line setter callbacks to struct gpio_chip. They allow > to indicate failures to callers. We're in the process of converting all > GPIO controllers to using them before removing the old ones. This series > converts all GPIO chips in renesas pin control drivers. Looks fine, builds fine. Thank you! --m9HLKi0jyL6BPHJD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmhJXiMACgkQFA3kzBSg KbarSA/+N40q5pc6ncbfya5l4DCj7mIJ5yMh6XMpJiyE7Rcw/NtxFYZWGAUzVkJY 0D7aoAyp5k2i9OxMoc9ZOdW585nst3fH1rKp7gzrkgp1lr9+kgetw034sMx6WgTu jJ1VsmfvdcXmkhngWYpc1Am52K4WkJkkW4CbkyEx8vealnOwrrDJpXscaoIzEFCN OZw9xH1Rux7+/yPYySgwAzCFySSj3tDOkN1fLmGpTE/XHqzEHtKduqwWKNu975E+ 4o6AboShUy5NjzvcKq0038vFKvDpLFqSb/sgguLNpCr32Qzg5kEleQjkZI7ocYkX i2pLjh4XDyfc0LFt8p7zPQYZnmWddRsxEXnWmUt0aseSXfPx1iwLMNBjC//qrpzG QNn4oA9GD8IoCOiSMY/AMp0z5IX4drls0rL8xoCbdvpSt9mep36JZzYXKXcUxsH8 fBYZDXvHhgVUylj2eMLdCShDU3/kHKSfVYKVFVJQj2PGaEjEbFde5dWPWTgPFVwj /ZED2wDSMoDBXmDGBALsern3pM8jtIN0Nz88PhnSqnv05WEb2uv5C/N9CWr1Djob p/B+Pnsy4l1z9Ldqrx6mWMnMsuYawcARYZsdZ7mL0m9GB2PNGqS8sCybMFmjK6cw I0xtwVZdqEoVQ+KYQfEMuLrNS3AExryMkV1U/8O/TPwqNULXou4= =1QtY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --m9HLKi0jyL6BPHJD--