From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: "Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
"Kent Gibson" <warthog618@gmail.com>,
"Jan Lübbe" <jlu@pengutronix.de>, "Marek Vasut" <marex@denx.de>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] gpio: sysfs: don't look up exported lines as class devices
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:47:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF6895xeiB19A6ig@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250623-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v2-6-d592793f8964@linaro.org>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:59:54AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>
> In preparation for adding a parallel, per-chip attribute group for
> exported GPIO lines, stop using class device APIs to refer to it in the
> code. When unregistering the chip, don't call class_find_device() but
> instead store exported lines in a linked list inside the GPIO chip data
> object and look it up there.
...
> + struct list_head list;
> };
If you make this to be the first member, you may make the container_of() (from
list_entry APIs) to be no-op. Have you checked with bloat-o-meter the difference?
...
> + struct list_head exported_lines;
> };
Ditto.
...
> - desc_data->value_class_node = sysfs_get_dirent(dev->kobj.sd, "value");
> + desc_data->value_class_node = sysfs_get_dirent(desc_data->dev->kobj.sd,
> + "value");
In such cases I find the following style to be slightly better to read.
desc_data->value_class_node =
sysfs_get_dirent(desc_data->dev->kobj.sd, "value");
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-27 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-23 8:59 [PATCH v2 0/9] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-23 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] gpio: sysfs: add a parallel class device for each GPIO chip using device IDs Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-27 15:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-30 8:34 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 9:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-23 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: sysfs: only get the dirent reference for the value attr once Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-27 15:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-30 8:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-23 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] gpio: sysfs: pass gpiod_data directly to internal GPIO sysfs functions Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-24 19:32 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-27 15:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-23 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] gpio: sysfs: don't use driver data in sysfs callbacks for line attributes Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-24 19:33 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-27 15:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-30 8:57 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 10:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-23 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-24 19:34 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-27 15:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-30 8:57 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 9:03 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-23 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] gpio: sysfs: don't look up exported lines as class devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-24 19:34 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-27 15:47 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-06-23 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: sysfs: export the GPIO directory locally in the gpiochip<id> directory Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-23 22:07 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-23 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] gpio: sysfs: allow disabling the legacy parts of the GPIO sysfs interface Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-24 11:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-24 19:40 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-27 11:40 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-23 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] gpio: TODO: remove the task for the sysfs rework Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aF6895xeiB19A6ig@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=jlu@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).