From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@nxp.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/16] pinctrl: check the return value of pinmux_ops::get_function_name()
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 16:50:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLb2HH5zgxdbDiPo@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Mfx5czDM=vfEYhFtVO3MviYaW4wKBYjGZ9ZnMbr-+T4mg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 03:29:31PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 3:06 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 01:59:10PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > >
> > > While the API contract in docs doesn't specify it explicitly,
> >
> > So, why not to amend the doc at the same time?
>
> Because this series is already big as is. That would be another commit
> that can be separate.
I meant _in the same_ patch.
> > > the generic implementation of the get_function_name() callback from struct
> > > pinmux_ops - pinmux_generic_get_function_name() - can fail and return
> > > NULL. This is already checked in pinmux_check_ops() so add a similar
> > > check in pinmux_func_name_to_selector() instead of passing the returned
> > > pointer right down to strcmp() where the NULL can get dereferenced. This
> > > is normal operation when adding new pinfunctions.
> > Fixes?
>
> This has always been like that.
>
> > Reported?
>
> I mean, technically Mark Brown reported my previous patch failing but
> I don't think we do this if we're still within the same series just
> another iteration?
>
> > Closes?
>
> Ditto.
I meant that this fixes a potential issue disregard to your series, right?
...
> > > while (selector < nfuncs) {
> > > const char *fname = ops->get_function_name(pctldev, selector);
> > >
> > > - if (!strcmp(function, fname))
> > > + if (fname && !strcmp(function, fname))
> > > return selector;
> >
> > I would slightly refactor this:
> >
> > const char *fname;
> >
> > fname = ops->get_function_name(pctldev, selector);
> > if (fname && !strcmp(function, fname))
> > return selector;
> >
> > > selector++;
> >
>
> You can do this in a subsequent patch, I prefer a smaller diff personally.
Sure.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 11:59 [PATCH v7 00/16] pinctrl: introduce the concept of a GPIO pin function category Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 01/16] pinctrl: check the return value of pinmux_ops::get_function_name() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 13:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-02 13:29 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 13:50 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-09-02 14:02 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 14:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 02/16] devres: provide devm_kmemdup_const() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 03/16] pinctrl: ingenic: use struct pinfunction instead of struct function_desc Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 04/16] pinctrl: airoha: replace struct function_desc with struct pinfunction Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 05/16] pinctrl: mediatek: mt7988: use PINCTRL_PIN_FUNCTION() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 06/16] pinctrl: mediatek: moore: replace struct function_desc with struct pinfunction Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 07/16] pinctrl: imx: don't access the pin function radix tree directly Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-03 12:07 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 08/16] pinctrl: keembay: release allocated memory in detach path Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 13:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-02 13:30 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 09/16] pinctrl: keembay: use a dedicated structure for the pinfunction description Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 10/16] pinctrl: constify pinmux_generic_get_function() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 11/16] pinctrl: make struct pinfunction a pointer in struct function_desc Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 12/16] pinctrl: qcom: use generic pin function helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 13:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-02 13:32 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 15:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-02 15:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-02 15:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 13/16] pinctrl: allow to mark pin functions as requestable GPIOs Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 14:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-02 17:50 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 14/16] pinctrl: qcom: add infrastructure for marking pin functions as GPIOs Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 15/16] pinctrl: qcom: mark the `gpio` and `egpio` pins function as non-strict functions Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 14:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-02 11:59 ` [PATCH v7 16/16] pinctrl: qcom: make the pinmuxing strict Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 14:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-02 17:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 20:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-03 7:33 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-03 10:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-03 10:34 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-03 10:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-03 10:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-03 10:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-03 11:05 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-03 11:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-03 12:06 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-03 11:06 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-03 7:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-02 14:46 ` [PATCH v7 00/16] pinctrl: introduce the concept of a GPIO pin function category Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-02 17:37 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-02 22:18 ` Linus Walleij
2025-09-03 11:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLb2HH5zgxdbDiPo@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexey.klimov@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=s32@nxp.com \
--cc=sean.wang@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).