From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37CF280330; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 14:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770214967; cv=none; b=tvl94jx/sWa3WrrO8XdmnTyMxaZBXsWYhKW3R4ihSHFQcno+wjpKr4gBz57QdhDx3VijQzYKS17hVr2gd7AnlvNjv2/PJqdsoS2TzOuu8OWmw9exgy0UY2xlU+lpE55BXf+Bd5EVGnAW3JbNQ9uZbd2cSvd/7FhUE5QNzVma8rI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770214967; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IrNP9aPjvILwnwoEewPVQMmwUR+z+tWND+goKGd2lig=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ohAhyGEmTwcWfEahSxTU6PrrjR6iD5HW0StR1w41Pi4iNjYmpHGaCICnpnng5DVA2agn2c3QO0DaZLJ/gIldJHVyZSlBywju+OrjX8BQ2cxYftfxg6UaMkYWR8qBXPkQKyHO2sTxJNZYf/cnmOIkjCIX0zudiAGuxkUfLQ8HoLY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=PImsfXR9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="PImsfXR9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770214968; x=1801750968; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=IrNP9aPjvILwnwoEewPVQMmwUR+z+tWND+goKGd2lig=; b=PImsfXR9BHic/fcwJrlYgM7qzsudEYTCiXl6vPOdMCoVyem38eDrH3jv IcgXBIxX9bsF/0kzmzTLA1QfgDmRi4kRZUyESDL2wxt01I+o8uv9TK0wQ /gyccaPIVqVd3VxmQZaI4QTd6wGneitY58Qs3du3vS1EZ8aXlsIrZm/7D k4cT5yL9z6/fG5ep6UVzcXnJn3KQmnIHBxozD5jBAddrAQ1Z7JE0rpmLD VEZ/+f3fiefsMHF/gcrssxzULtUAlIu5363b2+gm1W+WBJ9T/FV8ypz4b GGvoD9r1mxwyQ8R/A1q6Gfj9x8x8S3bKJGQvgJOBbruSWcJK+q2zp9/u4 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kbE5SahjSfqZEeJBskmlCg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: c2n8LpUTS1uQGydvPn99+Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11691"; a="75252955" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,272,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="75252955" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2026 06:22:47 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: S2N85vwdSnaWdLO1IP1BCw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7foP+xnfTiWmLWigJKydsw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,272,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="214350282" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.188]) by ORVIESA003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2026 06:22:45 -0800 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 16:22:42 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Conor Dooley Cc: Linus Walleij , Conor Dooley , Xianwei Zhao , Neil Armstrong , Kevin Hilman , Jerome Brunet , Martin Blumenstingl , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] pinctrl: pinconf-generic: move ..dt_node_to_map_pinmux() to amlogic-am4 driver Message-ID: References: <20260203-craftsman-battered-3491ff68f462@spud> <20260204-crawlers-nacho-d7c9021cdb6f@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260204-crawlers-nacho-d7c9021cdb6f@spud> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 02:15:10PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 09:05:34AM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 12:34:36AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 5:17 PM Conor Dooley wrote: ... > > Note, please, remove extra '.' (dot) in the Subject.o > > fwiw, the .. was intentional cos I was truncating the pinconf_generic > from the function since the subject was really long, not referring to > a member of an ops struct. Yes, and that's how we refer to the callbacks — with a single dot and parentheses: .my_cool_cb() Alternatively ->my_cool_cb() but it one character longer and TBH it slightly less readable (I personally used the latter and then switched to the former in the recent years). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko